Tech Bytes: Copyright reform pledge gaining steam - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 08:40 PM | Calgary | -10.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Tech Bytes: Copyright reform pledge gaining steam
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Copyright reform pledge gaining steam

By Peter Nowak, CBCNews.ca

With so many issues vying for attention as the Canadian election draws nearer, it's getting harder and harder to get support for one's own particular favourite. It's notable, then, that University of Ottawa internet law professor Michael Geist is managing to drum up significant political backing for balanced copyright reform legislation.

A quick summary of recent history: late last year, the Conservatives were set to introduce their proposed reforms, but backed off at the last minute in December when details of the legislation were leaked. The reforms that were supposed to drop were reportedly overly restrictive to users and skewed heavily toward copyright holders, which led to major consumer outrage. A Facebook protest group started by Geist drew tens of thousands of supporters in a matter of days, not to mention a rally at Industry Minister Jim Prentice's office in Calgary.

In June, Prentice indeed rolled out the legislation, Bill C-61, and said it had been revised to better balance the interests of consumers and copyright holders, a "win-win" proposition.

The public, opposition politicians and Geist didn't buy it, though. They pointed out numerous problems with the proposed reforms, including a loophole that would outlaw the breaking of digital locks placed on any electronic media. That point essentially invalidated the other pro-consumer clauses in the legislation, critics said.

The Conservative bill died on the order paper once the election was called, but it's fair to believe it will again be resurrected if the party returns to power as either a minority or majority government. With that in mind, Geist two weeks ago challenged election candidates to take a pledge posted on his website dedicated to supporting balanced copyright reform. The pledge consists of three tenets:

1. To respect the rights of creators and consumers.

2. Not to support any copyright bill that undermines or weakens the Copyright Acts users rights.

3. To fully consult with Canadians before introducing any copyright reform bill and to conduct inclusive, national hearings on any tabled bill.

Two weeks on, Geist reports the pledge has the support of the entire Green Party, more than one third of the NDP and about 15 Liberals. The NDP's digital spokesman, Charlie Angus, has also come out strongly against Bill C-61, which he says "will criminalize fans, leave artists on the sidelines and offer a windfall to corporate lawyers.

Notable exceptions from Geist's list so far are the Liberals' industry critic Scott Brison, who in June said Bill C-61 would create "a police state," and Dan McTeague, the consumer affairs critic.

Not surprisingly, he says, is the complete lack of Conservative support.

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

This discussion is nowOpen. Submit your Comment.

Comments

Magpie

Ontario

Once again Harper proves that he'd rather kiss American butt than listen to Canadians.

Posted October 7, 2008 10:30 PM

Wayne

This is going to sound nasty, but Stephen Harper is looking more and more like a George W. Bush clone. Between trying to ignore science that he doesn't agree with, and passing legislation that appears dictated by the large American record companies and movie studios, he is following in Dubya's footsteps.

Posted October 9, 2008 07:36 PM

Jason

Ajax

I would definitely oppose this copyright law. It violates a person's privacy and the users would only use it for private use and not exhibit it for any profit. It's like team Viacom is winning this copyright battle.

Not only that, what if authorites seize property after you downloaded a file that was personally your own created music or video? That would send out a huge lawsuit that could be worth billions.

It's like someone would say "So the government took a video or MP3 file that I had made for non-profit purposes and without trying to acquire my permission, used it in a for-profit broadcast and then they charged me with copyright infringement and had my computers and MP3 players confiscated. Folks, this is, as we say down here in the South, 'bass-ackwards.'"

Posted October 15, 2008 02:39 PM

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Note: Due to volume there will be a delay before your comment is processed. Your comment will go through even if you leave this page immediately afterwards.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Canada »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Politics »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Health »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Arts & Entertainment»

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Technology & Science »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Money »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Consumer Life »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Sports »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »