Washington Redskins controversy: 3 things you need to know | CBC Sports - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 06:20 PM | Calgary | -5.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
NFLAnalysis

Washington Redskins controversy: 3 things you need to know

Here are three things to know about the Washington Redskins controversy, and how it may affect the CFLs Edmonton Eskimos' ability to continue with their moniker.

Will the issue force the CFLs Eskimos to change their name?

FCC considers banning the word "Redskins"

10 years ago
Duration 1:08
FCC considers banning the word "Redskins"

In the debate regarding the Washington Redskins, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the U.S.equivalent to theCRTC is pondering a move that would discipline broadcasters for using the controversial name.

Many consider it a slur to Native Americans, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters on Tuesday.

With that in mind, here are three things to know about the controversy, and how it may affect the CFL's Edmonton Eskimos:

Why doesn't the NFL simply put pressure on Washington owner Daniel Synder to change the name?

Whether or not commissionerRoger Goodell can influence Snyder to change the team's name seems moot at the moment. That's because Goodell continues to support Snyder on this issue. In June 2013, Goodell defended Snyder's right to keep the name in a letter to 10 members of the U.S. Congress as thegroup had called on the NFL bossto intervene. And this is whatGoodellhadto say during his state of the league address two days before the Super Bowl in January: "This is the name of a football team [and it has been] presented in a way that honours Native Americans," he said, adding that a recent survey showed that nine of 10 Native Americans support the name.

Why doesn't Daniel Synderconsider a name change?

Let's start with this quote he gave to USA Today back in 2013: "We'll never change the name. It's that simple. NEVER. You can use caps." WhileSynder is stuborn, he's a successful owner. In Forbes'latest ranking of the top 50 most valuable franchises, Washington was listed at No. 9 with a value of $1.7 billion U.S.

Merchandising is a big part of Snyder's profit margin. The Redskins sell millions of hoodies, sweaters, T-shirts andcoffee mugs with the controversial logo.On a personallevel, Synder was a lifelong fan before he bought the team. In his 2013 letter to fans he said that the name stays "true to our history and honouring the deep and enduring values our name represents." He also continues to seek out Native Americans who agree with his position as another defence.

Snyder's defiance won't stop his detractors.

Last week Comedy Central's "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" aired a controversial report involving a group of Washington Redskins fans being confronted by Native Americans who want the NFL franchise to change its name and logo.

Will the controversy regarding theRedskins put pressure on the CFL'sEskimos to change their name?

It may depend on the outcome, and it's definitely in the early stages of the debate. Daniel Johnson, Edmonton outreach worker and native studies researcher told CBC News that the name is "outdated, inaccurate and mostly unaccepted in current discourse, and entirely inappropriate for a sports team," adding that "quite a number of people on social media" demandedan Edmonton CFL team name change over the past few years.But Allan Watt, vice-president of communications and marketing for theEskimos, told CBC News that there is no debate as far as the CFL club is concerned. "We have no backlash from our fans or politicians or any other sort," he said.