Liberal MP's flyer wrongly tells constituents Liberals restored veterans' pensions

A Liberal MP has sent flyers to his constituents touting the government's record on the veterans file, claiming it has alreadyrestored lifetime pensions for wounded veterans when in fact it has done no such thing.

CBC News first reported last month that the Liberal government is actually taking veterans,whoare pushing for the restoration of this benefit, back to court after a legal truce of sorts reached by the former Conservative governmentexpired in May.

• Court action over veterans benefits turns 'Liberal election campaign into a lie,' lawyer says
• Frustration over New Veterans Charter boils over in lawyer's letter to Liberal MPs
• 'Doing right' byinjured veterans with lifelong pension plan,Trudeausays

Justice department lawyers are nowpurportedly advancing the same legal arguments used during the Harper era, namely that Canada does not have a social contract or covenant with veterans, and that a "scheme providing benefits cannot be said to amount to a deprivation merely because claimant views the benefits as insufficient."

But a flyer sent toconstituents in Robert-Falcon Ouelette's Winnipeg Centre riding presents a list ofof "Some of what we've done (so far)," and includes "Reformed veteran's benefits and the delivery of services to veterans, including bringing back lifelong pensions for injured vets," among other achievements.

The flyers which are colloquially called "10 percenters" or "householders" caught the attention of one of Ouelette's constituents,Bill Paolini, the father of an Afghan war veteran who has been following the Equitas lawsuit and the prolonged struggleby the plaintiffs in that case to secure pensions for injured veterans.

"Personally, I think he's trying to pull the wool over people's eyes," Paolini said of the MP's flyer. "I think he should retract the flyer andissue a correction and apologize.It's very deceptiveto think that that went out to the whole riding."

Paolinisaid he donated money to the Ouellete campaign, and voted for the Liberal party in the last election in part because of its promiseto help veterans like his son, who fought primarily in thePanjwaidistrict of Afghanistan.

His son would not be entitled to a wounded veteran pension even if it is restored, he said, but he has a vested interest in seeing other soldiers who face crippling mental and physical ailments get their fare share from the government theyserved.

"It makes me feel like I've been lied to. I really thought the Trudeau government was going to do something. That's one of the big reasons why I voted for the party, was because of their stand on veterans and making things right for them. I feel like I've been let down and I've beenled down the garden path," he said.

Paolini reached out to Ouellette's office after receiving the flyer in the mail, asking for an explanation but received an answer with information about different programs.

He also sent an e-mail to Prime Minister JustinTrudeau'soffice with a heartfeltplea: "Do the honourable and right thing and restore the veteran's pensions. Don't make them fight the battles they have already fought. Don't let them suffer any longer," he wrote.

When contacted by CBC News, Ouellette's office said thatthe reference to "lifelong pensions"was an error.

"As someone who has served in the armed forces, this is an issue that is of particular importance to me," Ouellette said in a statement."The government of Canada is taking historic steps to ensure Canadian veterans and their families receive the care, compassion and respect they deserve, especially veterans with disabilities," he wrote,pointing to the budget 2016's substantial new funding commitments.

Trudeau campaigned on restoring lifelong pensions

The promise to restore lifelong pensions for injured veterans was inVeterans Affairs Minister Kent Hehr's mandate letter from the prime minister, but was notably absent from the government's first budget introduced in March.

The government didcommitnew pools of money for other campaign promises, including increasing the disability award and boosting the earnings loss benefit for injured veterans andexpanding access to the permanent impairment allowance but pensions remainthe biggest sticking point.

Trudeau promised to restore that benefit which was replaced by lump-sum payments with the introduction of the New Veterans' Charter in 2006 on the campaign trail during the last federal election.

Liberals also promised veterans in their platform that they wouldn't have to"fight the government"for the support and compensation they have earned.

The plaintiffs in the Equitas lawsuithave argued in court that the lump-sum payment wounded veteransreceiveunder the new charter is inadequate compensation, as they receive less money over the course of a lifetime.

Hehr's office and the minister himself in question periodhas repeatedly laid blame on the previousConservative government for forcing veterans to go to court to "ensure their own well-being."

But Hehr has not explained why he has allowed the peace agreement of sorts, struck by the former veterans affairs minister Erin O'Toole, to lapse.

"I cannot discuss the specifics of an ongoing court case," Hehr said in a recent statement.

The Alberta cabinet minister has said he was "given a strong mandate to restore critical access to services for veterans," by the prime minister, and that includes "providing a pension option for injured veterans, and I can assure Canadians that I remain committed to this, and to fulfilling all items in my mandate letter."