House essay: Decorum or boredom in Question Period? - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 08:34 PM | Calgary | -7.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

House essay: Decorum or boredom in Question Period?

Evan Solomon, host of CBC Radio's The House, reflects on the debate over the lack of decorum during Question Period, as heard in his weekly radio essay on Feb. 2, 2013.
NDP House Leader Nathan Cullen speaks about expanding the powers of the Speaker of the House of Commons, Tuesday, January 29, 2013 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Evan Solomon, host of CBC Radio's The House, reflects on the debate over the lack of decorum during Question Period, as heard in his weekly radio essay on Feb. 2, 2013.

It's a zoo that needs a strict zoo keeper.

Well, that's what you might think about Question Period if you listen toCullen. After all,he's put forward a motion to deal with members whouse "harassment, threats, and personal attacks."

He's also proposing new punishmentslikesuspending a member's sessional allowance.

The decorum debate has very deep roots.

During the early years of Confederation, historians talk about "throwing of paper, books and other missiles, including firecrackers."

You don't geta lot of firecrackers these days, you're lucky to even get verbal firecrackers.

Cullen is right. Sometimes MPs from all sides do go too far. But isn't that the exception, not the rule?

'When we fail to do our jobs with respect and civility, MPs should lose that privilege' NDP House Leader Nathan Cullen

And MPs are usually quick to apologize.

And doesn't the Speaker already have tools to deal with those who don't?

In 1987, Speaker John Allen Fraser refused to recognize MP Jim Fulton forthree weeks until he finally withdrew hisoffending remarks.

Is Question Period really worse today?

Compare that to, say, what it sounds like in the UK Parliament.

In the UK, there are rapid fire exchanges, no notes, no reading, heckling, and it's well... riveting.

It makes you wonder, is the problem with QP in Canada really bad behaviour or is it boring behaviour?

I meanMPs here are not supposed to read from prepared notesbut they do it all the time.

Does it turn the cut and thrust of debate, which is the point of QP, into a slow swapping of talking points?

Committee meetings are there for more considered debate.

John F. Kennedy once said Winston Churchill marshaled the English language and sent it into battle.

Language is a weapon of politics. Why muzzle it in its best arena?

After all, people do love going to zoo but not if the lions are never allowed to roar.