Canada a 'high-priority' target for Chinese interference, CSIS doc tells Hogue inquiry

Canada was considered a "high-priority" target for Chinese interference ahead of the 2021 election, according to a top-secret intelligence assessment viewed bythe Hogue commission inquiry on Thursday.

The inquiry is investigating whether Beijing, Russia, India and other nations interfered in the past two elections, and how information about foreign interference flowed within the federal government. Commissioner Marie-Jose Hoguewas chosen to lead the inquiryafter media reports accusedthe People's Republic of China of meddling in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

"PRC [foreign interference] activity targeting Canada's democratic institutions is primarily motivated by a desire to cultivate relationships with or support political candidates and incumbents who seem receptive or actively promote PRC viewpoints," says the July 2021 threat assessment by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

"Canada is a high-priority PRC FI target and the party intends to use Canada and Canadians to proactively support PRC interests."

The assessment was one of 13 documents cited by inquiry Thursday in an exercise testing the bounds of what the government and intelligence agencieswill share publicly.

While chunks of the nine-page document were redacted,most of it was readable. Other documents shared with the inquiry, including one about China's tactics, have been entirely redacted.

CSIS Director David Vigneaultwas questioned Thursday about CSIS's reasons for redacting some documents and not others.

During this week's preliminary hearings,the commission is wrestling with the question of how to conduct a public inquiry when most of its documentary evidenceincludes sensitive or secret government information.

Another document shared with the commission was entirely blacked-out by redactions. Vigneault suggested it dealt with raw intelligence some of the most closely-held information in CSIS.

"In other contexts, it's possible that [by] referencing something that may not be classified, because it's related to ChinaChinese intelligence services would be able to make deduction and be able to make analysis of what we know, what we're interested in," he said."And that this is the the root of why we are protecting information."

CSIS's'purpose' is secrets: Vigneault

The questions Vigneaultfaced Thursday morning did not delve into the contents of the CSIS documents but instead focused on why and how some information is redacted, while other details are simply removed.

Vigneault said CSIS has agreed to a "tailored" procedure to share documents and will have a specialized unit in place to decidewhat can be shared openly with the inquiry.

"The intent we bring to the commission is to be able to be as transparent as possible within the limitations that exist," he said, adding that"the purpose of CSIS is to have secrets."

WATCH: CSIS director defends agency's approach to secrecy

'The purpose of CSIS is to have secrets,' CSIS director tells inquiry

8 months ago

Duration 0:49

Appearing before the public inquiry into foreign election interference, CSIS Director David Vigneault was questioned about the agency's reasons for redacting some documents. Vigneault said the documents include classified information that was meant for intelligence experts.

Alia Tayyeb, deputy chief of signals intelligence at the Communications Security Establishment, said her agency has a similar setup in place for the commission.

"This is not the normal procedure," she said.

Vigneault said it took staff200 hours to deal with the 13 documents mentioned Thursday.

"Experts reviewed each and every line," he said. "It's a very significant amount of resources."

The discussions this week on national security are meant toset the stage for the next round of public hearings, scheduled for March.

Those hearings are intended to investigate allegations of foreign interference by China, India, Russia and others in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. The inquiry'sinterim report is dueMay 3.