Canada opposes Taliban talks before end of violence - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 04:54 AM | Calgary | -12.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Canada opposes Taliban talks before end of violence

As the Afghan and U.S. governments keep trying to negotiate palatable terms for reconciliation talks with the Afghan Taliban, the Canadian government maintains that while violence against civilians continues, the Taliban remains a terrorist organization.

No evidence Taliban prepared to stop attacks, Chris Alexander says

Parliamentary secretary Chris Alexander, seen here while serving as Canada's ambassador in Afghanistan in 2005, says there can be no reconciliation with the Taliban while the group's campaign of violence continues. (Terry Pedwell/Canadian Press)

As the Afghan and U.S. governments keep trying tonegotiate palatable termsfor reconciliation talks with the Taliban, Canada maintains that while violence against civilians continues, the Taliban remains a terrorist organization.

"It's always been a precondition that those who want to take part in reconciliation lay aside their weapons, lay aside their campaign of violence, agree to live under the laws of Afghanistan and the constitution of Afghanistan and then start the hard process of reintegration," the parliamentary secretary to Canada's defence minister said Wednesday.

Chris Alexander, himself a former Canadian ambassador to the country, said thatrecent attacks on civilians, including women and children, are evidence that the Taliban is not prepared to end its violent campaign.

"Yes, beyond those red lines there are deals that can be made, there are issues that can be discussed," hetold CBC News.However, "you can't negotiate and fight at the same time."

TheAfghan Taliban which has maintained a government in exile also known as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was removed from power after NATO allies invaded the country in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

The Afghan Taliban was replaced with a democratically elected government, currently led by Afghan President Hamid Karzai. But the Taliban maintained a leadershipand organizational structureevenout of power.

In May, Canadalisted the Afghan Taliban as a banned terrorist group the first NATO-allied country to use its domestic laws to outlaw the group.

Fight for political legitimacy

Earlier this week the Taliban opened an embassy of sorts in Doha, Qatar, which is nowat the centre of discussions around the terms for reconciliation negotiations.

Karzai opposed a U.S. effort atpeace talks withthe Taliban, and after a ribbon-cuttingopening ceremonyTuesday called the Doha headquarters a "political office." The idea of the U.S. meeting directly with the Taliban appeared to challenge the Karzai government's leadership role in the reconciliation process.

President Barack Obama acknowledgedKarzai's "enormous mistrust" after so many years of conflict. Secretary of State John Kerry, however,continues to try to get the Taliban to come tothe table and talk about ending the war.

On Thursday, the Taliban proposed a prisoner exchange with the U.S.that could free an American soldier in return for five senior operatives currently held at Guantanamo Bay.

Alexander said Wednesday that Canada wants the Karzai government to take the lead in any talks with the Taliban.

"Everyone agrees that there needs to be a peace and that reconciliation is one of the paths to peace in Afghanistan. There's no debate about that among allies. There's no debate about that in the region," the parliamentary secretary said.

"So far we haven't seen a serious effort or a serious offer to engage in reconciliation from the Taliban. We hope that will change. The evidence so far is to the contrary," he said.

Afghan troops now in charge

Moves towards reconciliation also sit uneasily withsome family members of Canadian soldiers killed during the conflict.

While Canada will continue its financial support in the future, Canadian troops are set to leave Afghanistan at the end of their current training mission in March 2014. Other NATO allies, including the U.S., are considering some kind of bridging force as the country's shaky transition continues.

Afghan troops are now taking the lead in combat, including no longer being able to count on military backup fromISAFforces when they run into trouble, as they did in a recent incident near Kandahar in lateMay when Afghan forces suffered casualties but NATO forces in the same area reportedly did not intervene.

"In coming months, as we determine just exactly what it means that Afghanistan and the national security forces have taken on security and defence roles, well have to work out all of the tactical decisions that go behind that," Canada's Chief of Defence Staff Tom Lawson said Wednesday duringan announcement of anew deployment of Canadian troops to Haiti.

"I think the more important thing is that symbolically they have taken on this role and we will continue to support them right up until the last troop is there," the general said.

"It makes me angry that the Taliban continue to attack communities, to engage ISAF and Afghan soldiers with the worst kind of tactics, with the blood loss that seems unabated," Defence Minister PeterMacKay saidat the same press conference.

"It does, of course, call into question the way in which the Afghan government itself has embraced its responsibility and its ability to conduct security operations in the future," the minister said. "We need a full court press at this critical time from the Afghan government in support of all of its security forces as it takes over this important responsibility."

Was 'Taliban Jack' right?

The very idea of sitting down with the Taliban to negotiate an end to the war was once mocked by Harper's Conservatives, who dismissed outright the late NDP leaderJack Layton for suggesting it might work as far back as 2006.

"[Calling for negotiations] got Jack Layton lots of attacks in the media in English Canada, calling him 'Taliban Jack' for having dared say you have to talk to all sides and have them all around the table," current NDP Leader Tom Mulcair reminded reporters Thursday.

"Well, guess what? That was the only way forward to peace. That's what we said in the NDP."

"The Taliban have to recognize they're not going to fight their way back to power," Alexander maintained.

"Let's not say that [reconciliation is] succeeding when we know perfectly well that the Taliban are still fighting and still engaging in a widespread campaign of deadly terrorist attacks. That's why we listed them as a terrorist organization."