Idle No More founder in Sask. court for 'unlawfully occupying park land' - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 05:36 AM | Calgary | -16.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Indigenous

Idle No More founder in Sask. court for 'unlawfully occupying park land'

Idle No More co-founder Sylvia McAdamand her brother Kurtis McAdamwill go to trial in a Saskatchewan courtroom on Wednesday for building a cabin on ancestral territory they say was intended to be set aside as reserve land.

Sylvia McAdam and her brother were building a cabin near Delaronde Lake

a woman sits on broken wood from a fallen tree
Sylvia McAdam is hoping that her case brings attention to the Doctrine of Discovery and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Call to Action 45. (Bryan Eneas/PAnow/JPBG)

Idle No More co-founder Sylvia McAdamand her brother Kurtis McAdamwill go to trial in a Saskatchewan courtroom on Wednesday for building a cabin on ancestral territory they say was intended to be set aside as reserve land.

They were issued a warning by the province in2017 for "unlawfully occupying park land."

The place where they were building a cabin was near Zig Zag Bay on the west side of Delaronde Lake, a 40-minute drive from Big River First Nation where they are registered members, about 200 km north of Saskatoon.

KurtisMcAdam was building the cabin when someone made a complaint.

"Provincial Court says it's a recreational site and that we're not allowedto build," said KurtisMcAdam.

"When my great-grandfather Saysewehum took treaty in 1878 at Fort Carlton, that land was supposed to be set aside for him," said Kurtis.

"Then what happened was a sickness took most of the community and from there it was supposed to be surveyed, but then a forest fire happened, so they never completed the survey."

Their grandfather, Albert McAdam Saysewehum, was the last of their family to live there.

"What I'm hoping is that it's recognized as a reserve, that Chief Saysewehum took treaty and that was the land that his descendants would live and that we can go back home to it."

Meetings with province

Sylvia McAdam said going to court is aculmination of failed meetingsbetween her family and the province over the years over whose territory it is.

"The meetings fell apart because they didn't agree with us when we told them that these are our lands and they have always been our lands," said McAdam.

"Even though they agreed with us that these are treaty lands, they said they had to uphold the Parks Act because it's part of their job."

A photocopied version of a ticket that was issued to Sylvia McAdam in 2017. (Submitted by Sylvia McAdam)

Section 25 of Saskatchewan's Parks Actstates: "No person shall enter, use or occupy park land except in accordance with this Act and the regulations."

She said she hopes thecase brings attention to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Call to Action 45, which is to "repudiate concepts used to justify European sovereignty over Indigenous lands and peoples such as the Doctrine of Discovery and Terra Nullius."

"We need people to start thinking seriously about that, because this government cannot pick and choose what they're comfortable to work with," she said.

In an emailed statementto CBCNews, Saskatchewan'sMinistry of Justicesaid it wasunable to discuss the details of cases that are before the courts.

The trialwill be in Prince Albertin Cree Court, a circuit court wherethe judge, clerks and court workers speak Cree and defendants canaddress the court in thatlanguage.