Visible minorities more concerned about Indigenous people's welfare than other Canadians, says poll

A recent pre-election survey suggests that visible minorities in Canada are more likely than the general population to be concerned about the quality of life of Indigenous people, while Indigenous peopleare more likely to be concerned about immigration.

Thepoll was commissioned by CBCNewsand was conducted by Public Square Research and Maru Blue between May 31 and June 10, and included 500 Indigenous people from across the country who responded online.

It found that 17 per cent of the people identifying as visible minorities surveyed were concerned about the quality of life in Indigenous communitiescompared to nineper cent of the general population in Canada.

"Coming from a visible minority, I think we really know the struggles that we face in our own home countries the persecutions, the genocides, the targeting because of the colour of our skin or the way we choose to practise our religions," said JamilehNaso.

Naso was born in a Syrian refugee camp and is the president of the Canadian Yazidi Association.

She brought a group of new Canadians to a drumming event at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg Thursday focusing on building a relationship between Indigenous and newcomer communities.

"When we come to a country like this and we hear the struggle of a community like the Indigenous Peoples, I think we feel for it in a different way... that empathy is there right away," said Naso.

Indigenous concerns with immigration

The poll also reported61 per cent of the Indigenous respondents were worried that accepting too many immigrants will change Canada, compared to 56 per cent of the general population.

Immigration is something that Indigenous educator Janice Millar admits to being concerned about.

She, along with school principal Mohamad Rezai, were guest speakers at the drumming event.

"I don't think that anyone is less welcoming," said Millar.

"It's the concern of, we're still in the background and we haven't moved forward."

Millar grew up in Winnipeg and said thatover the past 20 years shehas noticed a significant increase in the number of newcomers in the city.

She is also not surprised that visible minorities in Canada were more likely to report being concerned with Indigenous Peoples' welfare.

"If we go down to the hood...they're living with Indigenous people side by side, being neighbours. They see firsthand what's going on," said Millar.

"And so I think they have a little more compassion than someone who's living in [the suburbs]."

Naso saidshe understands why Indigenous people might be cautious about immigration.

She said there is a lot of miscommunication between the two groups, with some newcomers thinking Indigenous peopleget things for free, while Indigenous peoplemay think immigrants are being given too much money.

Naso works with both newcomer and Indigenous communities and is hoping to create an understanding between the two.

"We face similar struggles and not so similar struggles at the same time," said Naso.

"So I think coming together and really uniting as one will really help all of our causes in the end."

The drumming event was organized by Jay Stoller, who runs an African drum group company known as the Drum Cafe.

His team gave out both African and Indigenous style drums to everyone in attendance, to share some songs.

Stoller said his idea for the event was to bring Indigenous peopleand newcomers together to help build understanding between the two groups.

Commissioned by CBC News, the Public Square Research and Maru/Blue survey was conducted between May 31 and June 10, 2019, interviewing 4,500 eligible voters. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have registered to participate in the Maru Voice panel. The data have been weighted to reflect the demographic composition of Canada, according to Statistics Canada. Because the sample is based on those who initially self-selected for participation in the Maru Voice panel rather than a probability sample, no estimates of sampling error can be calculated. However, a comparable probabilistic national sample of 3,000 voters would have a margin of error of +/- 1.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, while samples of 500 voters have a margin of error of +/- 4.4 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.