Ontario Superior Court upholds decision over expropriated riverfront land

The Ontario Superior Court has upheld a decision concerning a long-running legal battle between a London developer and the City of Windsor over the land expropriation to complete a series of parks alongWindsor's waterfront.

In 1995, ShergarDevelopment Inc. purchased land from CP Rail for $750,000. Itconsistedof a 5.7-hectare parcel along the Detroit River from approximately CaronAvenue to Crawford Avenue, and a 2.4-hectare parcel nearby that consisted of a former railway corridor.

The parcelsare located to the north and to the east, respectively, of the CBC Windsor studios on Riverside Drive and Crawford Avenue.

The City of Windsor expropriated the riverfront parcel in 1998, in an effort to fulfil a long-running desire for a riverfront park, offering the developer $500,000.

In the years since, the city has integrated the parcel into the city park system, with paved trails,natural features and a playground.

"This really made the entire riverfront parkland we have now, possible," explained city lawyer Patrick Brode. "Itwas the last link to get."

Legal challenges

Shergarchallenged the legality of the land seizure unsuccessfully through a series of cases that lasted until 2007.

Then in 2013, the company contested the city's valuation of the land it offered in the expropriation process.In 2015, the city offered $1,208,155.98 to Shergarto settle the matter before it would be heard by the now-defunct Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).

The company declined the offer, believing the value of the land was somewhere in the range of $3.9 million to $5.1 million.

When the OMB made its ruling in 2016, it determined the land was $710,000, and that since CP Rail held themortgage on the property, Shergar was only owed$266,832.32, plus interest.

"It was significantly less than the offer that the city had made before the whole trial," Brode said. "So the question became who had to pay for the cost of this hearing before the OMB?"

The OMB decided in 2018 that Shergar should be responsiblefor paying for the city and its own legal costs for the proceeding, a decision that one commentator called "an unprecedented award of costs to the expropriating authority."

The Ontario Superior Court has now upheld that decision.

"They said in effect, 'Look, you received a fair offer from the municipality for the land that you lost, and as an owner, you have a right to full compensation ... but it becomes unreasonable it starts to border on reckless when you proceed with a case even though you've got a very good offer on the table,'" Brode said.

CBC News contacted Shergar'sKitchener-based lawyer,but has not heard back.

According to Brode, the right to appeal is not automatic, but the company could seek one if it desired.