City to cover $537K provincial funding gap for Windsor homelessness programs - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 01:53 PM | Calgary | -11.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Windsor

City to cover $537K provincial funding gap for Windsor homelessness programs

Homelessness programs in Windsor are breathing a sigh of relief after council voted to fill a significant funding gap left by the Fordgovernment.

Debate focused on who should fund CHPI programs this year the province or the city

Council voted 7-3 to pull $567,000 out of its Budget Stabilization Fund and give it to Windsor's CHPI programs. Those who opposed the decision say the city is setting a bad precedent by filling a gap left by the province. (Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Homelessness programs in Windsor are breathing a sigh of relief after council voted to fill a significant funding gap left by the Fordgovernment.

In April, city administrationlearned that a previously committed $537,000 increase in the province's Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) would be deferred by one year.

On Monday, Windsor city council voted 7-3 to provide that money using its Budget Stabilization Fund.

"I think that council made a responsible decision or at least those that voted in favour today. The others, I say, shame on them," said Ron Dunn, executive director of the Downtown Mission.

"The people on the street don't care whose job it is to fund it. They just need funding."

The Downtown Mission doesn't receive government funding of any kind. But executive director Ron Dunn still attended Monday's council meeting because, according to him, homelessness has become an 'epidemic' in Windsor. (Sanjay Maru/CBC)

The job of who should fund Windsor's CHPI programs was the main point of contention during Monday's delegations.

Windsor Mayor Drew Dilkens along with councillors Jo-Anne Gignac, Ed Sleiman and Fred Francisvoted against using the city's money to support CHPI programs in Windsor because they believed it would set a bad precedent.

"It's a very slippery slope, very dangerous for the municipality to step into the shoes of another level of government especially one that has more money than you and one that's in austerity mode, that's in the midst of making big cutbacks," Dilkens said after the meeting.

The province has promised to increase that funding next year but according to Dilkens, that's unlikely to happen.

Francis also opposed the motion, citing similar concerns. The Ward 1 councillor said there are more cuts "coming down the pipeline" and providing funding for a provincial program is not the city's responsibility.

"If there's going tobe cuts to health care and education, is city council going to step into education and health care? That's not our portfolio. That's not our mandate," said Francis.

"I don't think that we have to step up and assume that responsibility and assume that role when it's not sustainable."

During Monday's meeting, advocatesfor Windsor's CHPI programs made their case to council as to why the city should provide financial assistance.

One of them included Mike Turnbull, mobile food bank coordinator for the Unemployed Help Centre, who discussed the benefits of theKeep the Heatprogram.

Keep the Heatis an emergency assistanceprogram which provides funding for those who are experiencing financial difficulties and risk having their utilities turned off due to unpaid bills.

"Last year, we assisted 852 households representing 2,315 people, of which 43 per cent were singleparents," said Turnbull, adding funding cuts could result in homelessness, difficulties paying rent, and Children's Aidremoving kids from their homes due to unfit living conditions.

For advocates of municipally-funded CHPI programs, the reasoning behind why some would oppose the motion isn't ignored. For Dunn, the provincial government needs to be "pushed to come through" with the funding it promised.

"So Drew and those who voted against the proposal tonight, theyaren't wrong," said Dunn."I understand exactly how they feel because the Mission absorbs the responsibility everyday, with no government funding.

"But again, it's about what's right. It's not about pointing fingers."