Ontario's back-to-school plan has no mandatory COVID-19 testing. Here's why experts say it's the right call - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 09:46 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Toronto

Ontario's back-to-school plan has no mandatory COVID-19 testing. Here's why experts say it's the right call

With two million Ontario students heading back to school this month amid a global pandemic, the provincial government says there is no scenario in which a student will be required to take a COVID-19 test.

Students may be advised to go for testing, but it is never an absolute requirement

Ontario students will experience a range of new safety protocols when they return to school this month, though mandatory COVID-19 testing will not be among the changes. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Despite some two million Ontario students heading back to school this month amid a global pandemic, the provincial government says there is no scenario in which a student will be required to take a COVID-19 test.

The omission of mandatory school testing was confirmed in Ontario's updated school reopening guidelines released last week, which appeared to come as a surprise to many parents and observers.

The decision was the focus of numerous headlines, while some on social media expressed surprise that mandatory testing would not be a requirement for students with symptoms, or used as a tool for proactive screening.

However, the province's strategy has the support of multiple public health and medical ethics experts interviewed by CBC Toronto, who say Ontario's decision to forgo mandatory COVID-19 testing in schools is appropriate, at least for the time being.

Under the province's latest reopening guidelines, parents and educators will be asked to screen for COVID-19 symptoms and keepchildren out of class if they are displaying a possible infection. Other students who come into contact with a known case of the disease will also be directed toself-isolate for 14 days.

In those scenarios, students may be advised to betestedby a health-care provider, but they will neverbe required to show proof of a negative test result before returning to class after their period of self-isolation.

Experts warn of uncertainties, ethical considerations

"Mandatory testing in some cases is quite beneficial. In school-aged children I think we have to be a bit more cautious," said Dr. Nitin Mohan, a physician epidemiologist and assistant professor at Western University.

While Mohan said mandatory testing could, "in theory," be an effective way to contain the spread of the coronavirus in schools, he said there are many uncertainties that make the reality more complicated.

Primarily, he pointed to inevitable false positive results and a lack of research onhow the virus spreads among children.

Properly screening for symptoms will likely be more effective than relying on test results, he explained.

"Mandatory anything in health care unless you really, really have to do itit's often best to avoid it," said Kerry Bowman, a bioethicistat the University of Toronto.

He said it'shard to make a case for strict mandatory testing since so little is known about its benefits, though he acknowledged there is no single correct answer.

"It's emotional," Bowman said. "We've never been in this position before."

Dr. Nitin Mohan said the benefits of mandatory testing are complicated by false positive results and a lack of research about how the coronavirus spreads among children. (Zoom)

Still, otherssay a policy for mandatory testing may contribute tokeeping schools safe.

"I think mandatory testing across the board would be a good thing and add another layer to the safety protocols that are being put in place," said Sam Hammond, president of the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario.

No Canadian jurisdictions have any form of mandated testing for students, and the strategy has not been widely adopted in other countries. Some German states reportedly introduced regular mandatory testing for students in the spring.

Better alternatives may be available

While none of the experts expressed outright opposition to the idea of mandatory testing, most said other strategies have a more realistic chance at preventing outbreaks.

The prospect of mandatory testing as a form of proactive screening in which students would be randomly tested regardless of their symptoms was also described as costly and burdensome.

Dr. Peter Juni, a University of Toronto professor and the executive director of Ontario's COVID-19 science advisory table, estimated that testing each student weekly would cost about $4 billion annually and far exceed the province's current testing capacities.

"If we were to do [testing] at the level of all students, it would simply not be possible," hesaid.

"We need to find a way that doesn't overburden the children, the school and the public health system. This needs a lot of creativity, and I don't think we have all the answers yet."

Experts say there are promising strategies in development that could both prevent outbreaks andalso providepublic-health officials with information about the prevalence of COVID-19 in schools.

Juni pointed to the emerging tactic of wastewater testing, in which health officials sample a location'swastewater for the presence ofCOVID-19. Positive test results can signal a possible outbreak more efficiently than individually testing all the people at a given location, he explained.

An approach like wastewater testing could provide many of the benefits of mandatory testing without the associated problems, Juni said, though he cautioned that it's not yet clear if Ontario has the capability to introduce it on a wide scale.