Laura Babcock's phone tracked near accused killers before her disappearance, jury hears

Testimony at the Laura Babcock murder trial entered a new phase Thursday up until now the jury has heard from family, friends, even random strangers, who were among the last people to see Babcock before she disappeared in July 2012.

Now the Crown has presented a mountain of technical evidence: pages of Babcock's phone records tracing her last calls and texts and placing her phone in the same location as Dellen Millard and Mark Smich's phones at the time of her disappearance.

The prosecution alleges Babcock was killed by Millard, 32, of Toronto, and his former best friend Mark Smich, 30, of Oakville, Ont., at Millard's home on July 3, 2012.

• ReadCBCNews'sfull coverageof the LauraBabcockmurder trial

Both men have pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder.

Babcock, 23, was usually glued to her Blackberry, but jurors saw on that summer night, all communication stopped.

Nicole Rebelo, an intelligence analyst with the Toronto Police Service, gave a lengthy PowerPoint presentation that tracked Babcock, Millard and Smich's phones as they connected with the same cellphone towers.

While much of the data presented was dense and complex, the jury heard that analysts are able to track a phone's location becausecalls and texts are transmitted through a cell site with the strongest signal usually within about 100 metres of the device.

Using phone records and Google Earth maps, Rebeloset out toshowin his testimony thatboth Babcock and Millard's phones hit the same cell site, at 5324 Dundas Street West, near Kipling transit stationin Toronto's west end, during the afternoon of July 3.

Both phones then moved to or near Millard's home in Etobicoke. At the same time, Smich's phone connected to a tower at 210 Markland Drive, just a few hundred metres of Millard's home.

Crown attorney Ken Lockhart, who led Thursday's questioning, didn't present any context for jury members as Rebelo listed the data.

But during opening statementson Oct. 23, Crown Jill Cameron outlined their case, alleging sometime after 7:00 p.m. July 3, Millard and Smich killed Babcock.

Rebelo said records show thefollowing morning, July 4, Babcock's phone continued to receive incoming calls and text messages and later, cell towers connected with both her phone and Millard's phones as they moved west from Millard's home, along the Lakeshore.

Somewhere near Mississauga, Babcock's phone stopped making connections with cell towers.

Millard, who is acting as his own lawyer, asked Rebelo to interpret some of the findings, but she said she couldn't. Her expertise is to compile the dataand map it.

He asked several other questions before concluding, "I don't think you're able to answer the questions I have, thank you."

Smich's lawyer, Thomas Dungey, had only one main question for Rebelo, suggesting that even if two people's phones connect to the same tower, it doesn't mean they are in the precise same location. She agreed.

Babcock's last call made near Millard's home

Earlier Thursday, a senior investigator with Rogers Communications,Danielle Fortier, took the jury through Babcock's last outgoing calls, presenting records that showed how frequently she was using her phone before she disappeared.

On June 30, 2012, there were 38 outgoing calls made and 74 texts sent, with similar volumes on July 1 and 2.

Court saw the last outgoing call was made at 7:03 p.m. on July 3, 2012.

It lasted 60 seconds and seemed to be consistent with checking voicemail. Fortier explained that after the phone number was entered, three digits were pressed, similar to a password.

Like Rebelo, Fortier testified Babcock's phone connected to a cellphone tower a few hundred metres from Millard's home.

During cross examination, Dungey again pointed out that cell tower information isn't a precise science.

"We don't really have an accurate picture of where the phone call came from, because there could be obstruction of some kind?" he asked.

Fortier agreed cellphone records can only highlight a general area, and weather or large objects, such as trees or buildings, could cause a call or text to bounce from the nearest cell site, to a farther one.

Meantime, Millard asked Fortier about a phone's subscriber information. He said just because someone is billed for a phone, doesn't mean they are using it.

She agreed, that's possible.