Billy Bishop airport runway one step closer to extension

A city council committee has approved the "fastest, safest option" to extend the runway at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport in response to a new federal airport safety requirement.

At its meeting on Tuesday, Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow's executive committee approved one of three optionsto meet the requirement for what are called runway end safety areas.

City staff say the intention of a runway end safety area, which is ground level land past the end of a runway, is to "reduce the severity of damage to an aircraft" if it were to overshoot or overrun a runway. The item goes to council on Oct. 9 for final approval.

City staff said in a report to the committee that the option approved would involvethe "minimum landmass" to meet the regulatory requirementat a cost of $61 million to $64 million. The amount would be paid by PortsToronto,which owns and operates the airport.

According to city staff, PortsToronto must have the runway safety end areas in place by July 12, 2027. "Airports in Canada are now required to have a minimum of 150 metres of safety length beyond runway ends," a city staff report said.

'No one is closing the airport':mayor

Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow, before the committee cast its vote, said the issue is about the safety of the airport's runway.

"For 14 years, Billy Bishop Airport knewthat the runway wastoo short. What should be the goal? Build as quickly as possible a runway that is long enough to make it safe. That is the top priority... because, heaven forbid, I don't want a plane having trouble, passengers experiencing trouble, because the runway is not long enough," shesaid.

Chow saidcity staff recommended the option that is the easiest to implement quickly.

"It's the fastest, safest option. I totally support it," shesaid.

City staff saidin their report that PortsTorontohas asked for a extension of the airport'slease to run for 48 years from 2025, which would mean an extension of its term from 2033 to 2073, or an extra 40 years.

The request prompted a larger discussion about the future of the airport at the meeting and some speakers who addressed the committee voiced their opposition to the island airport.

A tripartite agreement between PortsToronto, the city and Transport Canada, signed in 1983, governs the airport's operations and acts as a both a lease and operating agreement. Chow said a discussion is needed about the agreement but thatnow is not the time. Any changes to the agreement would require all parties involved to agree and council approval would be required for any changes. The agreement expires in 2033.

"That's a long conversation. We can have that conversation after we fix the runway. Let's fix the runway now. No one is closing the airport," Chow said.

City staff saidin their report that each of the three options requires lakefill and thatthe volumeof lakefilland the width of the airport's landmass increases with each option.

According to city staff, option one involves the lowest risk to meet the federal safety requirement by the federal deadline, has the lower project cost than the other two options, avoids the need for additional planning approvalsand can be done in the shortest amount of time with the smallest amount of lakefill.

'Safety is the highest priority,' councillor says

Coun. Ausma Malik, who represents Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York, said option one makes sense for the city and delivers the essential safety requirement with the least risk in the most efficient way.

"I can't stress this enough that safety is the highest priority," Malik said.

"That is critical for everyone who uses the airport, who works there, for the communities around the airport, for our waterfront, for us as a city," Malik said.

Deputy Mayor Jennifer McKelvie, who represents Ward 25, Scarborough-Rouge Park, said she would like to see the best option, not the fastest option.

"I think we have to accept that this airport is here for a long time. It services many people. It's servicing a wide array of stakeholders with a wide array of benefits," McKelvie said.

During the meeting, councillors were told that the airport is an important part of the city's economy as well as itshealth care system.

Daniel Tisch, CEO of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, said the airport is valuable not only to the city but also to the province.

"The airport is a unique asset and not investing in this asset would be a real tragedy," Tisch said.