U of R profs say camera 'surveillance' during exams does not address cheating concerns

Faculty members at the University of Regina are slamming the administrative decision to put video cameras in exam rooms in an attempt to combat cheating and academic misconduct.

"Such activity is what we might call surveillance," said Darlene Juschka, who is an associate professor of Women's and Gender Studies and Religious Studies.

• U of R to record video in exam rooms to catch cheaters
• Cheating incidents in the U of R faculty of arts have almost doubled in the past three years

There have been several cases of academic misconduct reported recently at the university.

In response, the University of Regina plans toset up video cameras in exam rooms. Reducing misconduct can help protect the reputation of the university,according to administration.

However, Juschkasaid the cameras won't address specificproblems that have been raised,such as plagiarism, computer breaches,theft, bribes orthreats to teacher assistants.

"Is it to look like we're doing something? What is the point in having this when it's not dealing with the problems pointed out to us."

Concerns over consent

The university said students can refuse to take anexam if they don't want to be videotaped. However, the student would be "deficient in a major course requirement and the appropriate grade being assigned."

"These are adults. I personally think their rights aren't being considered," Juschka said.

"If they don't consent, they should not be punished for that."

We're also worried about the notion of putting in cameras which are fear-based control.-Dennis Fitzpatrick

She said cheating must be dealt with but doesn't think video recordings are the solution.

The unwillingness to write the exams comes at a significant cost, and so students' consent to be videotapedis coerced, said Dennis Fitzpatrick, professor of biochemistry and president of the University of Regina Faculty Association President.

Lack of consultation

Fitzpatrick has raised concerns about consent, but he also said theassociation is displeased by the lack of dialogue.

"It came out of nowhere. There was no consultation and this is the kind of major change that students, faculty and faculty associations should be involved in discussing," hesaid.

Hepenned a letter to the approximately 1,400 members of the faculty association, detailing his concerns about thecameras.

"We're also worried about the notion of putting in cameras which are fear-based control. We would like to see is a plan to ensure that exams are monitored."

Fitzpatrick said the association wants the institution to find the right solution to cheating rather than the quick one.He suggested having multiple versions of each exam.

The university has planned ayear-long project to assess thestate of academic integrity oncampus

Fitzpatrick said hewants whatever recommendations that come out to be embraced, funded and rapidly implemented.

He said the university's faculty association spoke with several others across Canadaand so far has yet to hear of another university that records final exams.