Regina councillors agree personal disputes distract from important work. They still keep happening. - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 05:55 AM | Calgary | -16.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Saskatchewan

Regina councillors agree personal disputes distract from important work. They still keep happening.

A series of integrity commissioner complaints has laid bare how some councillors are feuding with one another, raising questions on how the body plans to work together in the last year of its term.

Council guided by code of conduct passed in 2017, but all rule violations have come during this council

Coun. Terina Nelson takes part in a meeting of Regina city council.
Coun. Terina Nelson sits opposite Coun. Andrew Stevens during a meeting of Regina city council. (Alexander Quon/CBC )

Disagreement at Regina city hall is common, healthy and encouraged, but a series of disputes between councillors have continuedto dominate their schedule.

It isapparent that some of council's members do not like each other and that is not going to change.

"I will work with anybody. I'm willing to bury the hatchet so long as it's not in my back," said Ward 3 Coun. AndrewStevens.

Councillors and Mayor Sandra Masters have insisted that the disagreements are not going to distract them from dealingwith civic issues, especially as they havelittle more than a year before the next municipal election.

In Regina, council is governed by a code of conduct.On Wednesday, councilspent hours dealing with a breach of those rules byStevens.

An integrity commissioner report ruled that theWard 3 councillorbreached the code after sharing a confidential reportin July 2022.

While the report did not provide details on the nature of Stevens' complaint, he told council that he had taken issue with the actions of Ward 7 Coun. Terina Nelson.

Man at a city council meeting.
Coun. Andrew Stevens was not censured after it was determined he violated Regina city council's code of conduct. (Alexander Quon/CBC)

Since the integrity commissioner's report dismissed the complaints, it was meant to remain confidential.

But when Stevens hit "reply all" to an agenda email and attached the report, he distributed it to members of city administration and fellow councillors.

Stevens has said his actions were a lapse in judgment.

He said he attempted to apologize to Nelson. She has denied that he apologized.

"I believe we needour residents to know that when something is said to us, when confidentiality is given to us, we respect that and we respect the oath that we took when we entered into the office," Nelson said on Wednesday.

LISTEN |Regina's mayor talks flooded underpasses, new pool and how to pay for it all

In a 7-to-1 vote,councillors ultimately decided to not censure Stevens or make him offer a written apology.

Stevenstold council that he wasn't willing to provide an apologyafter recent but unspecified comments made by Nelson online.

"It tells me that the commissioner process is being weaponized by the councillorand, for that, I'm not in the position to offer a meaningful apology," said Stevens.

"Instead, I will offer an apology to council over how much time and energy this vexatious complaint has causedand, for that, I am really sorry."

Nelson declined tospeak with media after Wednesday's council meeting.

Disputes becoming the norm

Masters was the sole vote rejecting the decision to not punish Stevens.

She later explained that her vote was becauseshe wished to remain consistent.

Masters voted to punish the only other councillor found to have violated council's code of conduct since it was introduced in 2017: Nelson.

In September2022, the city's integrity commissioner ruled Nelson was disrespectful to fellow councillors and residents. Council declined to punish Nelson after she revealed she suffered from a severe brain injury andattention deficit disorder.

With the only two violations of the code of conduct coming during this council's tenure,it hasleft other members frustrated and wanting to return to civic business.

"It's done. I want to move on. I don't want to deal with this anymore. We've got many, many other issues to deal with that are more important," said Ward 5 Coun. John Findura.

Masters maintainedthat council can remain focused on what is important instead of interpersonal dispute.

"Council has no problem doing business. You saw it tonight. We've seen it since the beginning of the year. We have passed an enormous amount of legislation and bylaws, investments, applications for funding. And so the business of council is continuing on just fine," she said.

A third conduct complaint from this council still needs to be resolved.

Stevens and Ward 1 Coun.Dan LeBlancwere foundto have violated the code of conduct for their actions in filing a lawsuit against Regina city manager Niki Anderson in an attempt to force her to include funding to end homelessness in the municipal budget.

That lawsuit failed but allegations of harassment related to the lawsuit were floated by Masters and Anderson.

While complaints of harassment were dismissed,LeBlanc and Stevens were found to have not acted in the best interests of the municipality.

WATCH|TwoRegina councillors should apologize for lawsuit against city manager: integrity commissioner

2 Regina councillors should apologize for lawsuit against city manager: integrity commissioner

1 year ago
Duration 1:46
The councillors filed a lawsuit against Niki Anderson for not including homelessness funding in the most recent proposed budget.

On Wednesday, Stevens theorized the complaint by Nelson was linked to the lawsuit. Despite their disagreement, Stevens said he is ready to get back to work.

"But if I have to constantly look behind me in terms of what kind of things are going to be said about me by a colleague in public on social media, that's a concern and I think we need some proper help."

The reporthas already received hours of debate but council has yet to formally accept the findings made against Stevens and LeBlanc. It must stilldecide whether censure or punishment are necessary.

That integrity commissioner report is scheduled to be dealt with bycouncil before July12.