Maxime Bernier part of group convicted of violating Sask. public safety rules - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 11:26 AM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Saskatchewan

Maxime Bernier part of group convicted of violating Sask. public safety rules

A Regina provincial court judge has found Maxime Bernier, along with six others, guilty of violating Saskatchewans public health order after an anti-COVID-19 restrictions rally was held in Victoria Park in May 2021.

Conviction stems from so-called freedom rally in Reginas Victoria Park in May 2021

A man with grey hair wearing a white and blue shirt under a suit jacket stands in front of two signs, one that says
A Regina provincial court judge has found Maxime Bernier, along with six others, guilty of violating Saskatchewans public health order after an anti-COVID-19 restrictions rally was held in Victoria Park in May 2021. (Jaison Empson/CBC)

The leader of the People's Party of Canada has been convicted of violating Saskatchewan's public safety rules in the thick of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In his 26-page decision dated May 25, provincial court judge Murray Hinds found Maxime Bernier a right-wing politician originally from Quebec and six others guilty in connection with what was advertised as a "freedom rally" in Regina two years ago.

At the time, there was a public health order in effect banning outdoor gatherings of more than 10 people. The order, put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19, was later repealed.

Police presented evidence that there were more than 200 people at the protest at the cenotaph in Victoria Park on May 8, 2021 and Bernier was among the promoted speakers.

More than a dozen people were ticketed at the time for attending the event.

At one point, defence lawyer Elaine Anderson argued her clients' charges were a violation of their charter right to peaceful assembly.

However, Justice Hinds rejected that argument late last year, ruling the public health order "is not unconstitutionally vague nor is it overbroad."