Councillors open door to fewer single-family suburban homes

Two Ottawa city councillors disagreewith new rules that could see fewer single-family homes built in the suburbs, but for different reasons.

On Wednesday, council approved changes to the official plan the city's overall planning blueprint to decrease the minimum number of single homes to 30 per cent of a new development, down from 45 per cent.

The maximum would remain at 55 per cent.

In other words, a new suburban community could now be built with just 30 per cent of homes being single-family dwellings and more multi-unit ones.

According to a city report, thechange "will permit greater flexibility in the provision of new housing and a greater likelihood that the target suburban housing densities are achieved in the remaining undeveloped lands."

• Barrhaven's 'final piece' could be a new downtown core
• Welcome to the 15-minute neighbourhood: Intensification key to city's official plan

The decisionis actually the culmination of policy changesthe city has tried to put in place over the last decade, changes which have in some cases been appealed by developers.

A more robust review of the housing mixis now taking place as part of the city's official plan review.

Parking issues

Despite the seeming technicality of the report to council, a couple of suburban representatives spoke out against the new measures.

Gloucester-South Nepean Coun. Carol Anne Meehansaid she understands the city wants to intensify all areas of the cityin an effort to avoid expanding the urban boundary.

But she said she was worried that the new housing mix would result in multi-residential complexes, including townhomes, that don't have enough parking space to accommodate vehicles andforces people topark onthe street.

According to the suburban councillor, residential streets are already so packed with parked cars sometimes that emergency vehicles have trouble driving through.

"Anybody who visits a new suburban area will recognize that we actually we have a serious parking issue," Meehan said.

"While I know that we're supposed to be encouraging people to be on transit in the city and to leave their cars at home, Ottawa is a vast city and our busing cannot accommodate everyone to get exactly where they want to go. So people are are buying these residential units and they have one, two, sometimes three cars."

The city's general manager of planning, Stephen Willis, said while he recognizes the issue thatMeehan described, more formal parkingwould defeat the city's aim of eventually bringing "a higher level of transit" to more areas of the city.

Kanata South Coun. Allan Hubley was somewhat less diplomatic, suggesting that Meehan "not exaggerate" the problems that parking creates on suburban residential streets.

Trades away leverage

Representing the opposite end of the city, Cumberland Coun. Stephen Blais opposed the rules because he believes communities would benefit more if the city negotiated proposeddevelopments one at a time.

"This takes all of our leverage away from the builders," said Blais.

Currently, developers who want to build more dense communities have to apply to the city, and those applications are "approved through negotiation," he said.

Those negotiations come with potential benefits, Blais added.

"[It's] getting the park faster. It's getting a bigger park with more money put into it. It's getting intersection modifications or speed reduction So let's not give them this density by default. Let's negotiate it to for the benefit of the community on a case-by-case basis."

Council approved the changes to the housing mix Wednesday, with Blais and Meehan voting no.