'Developers control city hall,' city councillor charges

A frustrated city councillor is blaming developer influence at Ottawa city hall as the reason behind a controversial decision made at the planning committee this week.

Capital ward Coun.Shawn Menard was visibly frustrated at the committee's Thursday meeting, where his Old Ottawa East residents were opposingchanges in the wording of acommunity plan they had developed over years of negotiations with city planners and the development firm The Regional Group.

• Residents 'betrayed' by city as 9-storey building on former Oblates land gets OK

After the committee passed anamendment to the official plan in a 8-to-1 vote, residents left the room callingthe process "disgusting" and Menard explained to them, "that's the way it is here [at city hall]."

Developers control city hall, and it's been this way for a very, very long time.- Coun. Shawn Menard

In Menard's view, his residents made good points but thedecision was coloured by councillors on the committee who take donations from developers during election campaigns.

"When those planning folks take $1,200 from the developer in question, that's a conflict of interest.But that's not the way it works in our city hall here. Why? Because developers control city hall, and it's been this way for a very, very long time," said Menard.

Menard campaigned last fall on reducingdeveloper influence. The largest donation in his filings is $1,000 from Shawn Menard Sr.

Developer donations

"I don't have any comment on this," said planning committee chair Coun. Jan Harder, when asked about Old Ottawa East residents who questioned whether the donations she has receivedhavean influence on her role.

There is nothing illegal about developers making donations. Campaign finance rules allowindividual peopleto give a maximum of $1,200.

The election last fall was the first in whichcorporations and unions were banned from donating.

The public are wary of the decisions being made at the city, how they're being made at the city, and for good reason.- Coun. Catherine McKenney

Historically, however, people inthe development community havedonated more to candidates than people inother sectors,and the issue of developer donations becamea hot topic among some voters during the last election campaign.

• ANALYSIS|Everything you ever wanted to know about developer donations
• ELECTION 2018 | Watson defends taking developer donations
• ELECTION 2018 | Majority on planning committee taking developer donations

Harder and vice-chair Coun. Tim Tierney, for instance,accepted $1,200 and $900 respectively from Josh Kardish, vice-president of EQ Homes, a partner in Greystone Village.

"My donations were made as a private citizen as I believe quite strongly in supporting the democratic system," Kardishtold CBC News by email.

Committee makeup a problem?

Coun. Catherine McKenneysaid whether or not the donations directly affect her colleagues' votes, "at the very least it sets up a serious perception problem."

"The public are wary of the decisions being made at the city, how they're being made at the city, and for good reason. And it only adds to thatmistrust that we're hearing and seeing from the public," McKenney said.

Shehas had her own frustrations with planning committee and council overturning community plans in favour of adeveloper's application, especiallyTrinity Group's trio of towersthat includes a65-storey buildingwhere 30 storeys were originally allowed.

"900 Albert [Street] will always bother me. I think it is the clearest and most egregious example of a secondary plan not being adhered to,"said McKenney.

She would like to see more urban councillorsrepresented on planning committee.

Its makeupwas put to a voteat the beginning of the term, andRiley Brockington and Menard were left off.Only Jeff Leiperrepresenteda ward in the coreuntil Brockington wasadded last month.

Menardsees a solution that goes a step further.

"This planning committee needs to be split up," he said. He would likesuburban and urban areas havetheir own committee to deal with planning applications, as happens withrural applications.