Letting bikes on LRT during peak hours a calculated risk

In a rare occurrence at City Hall, council voted 15 to 9 Wednesday against a staff recommendation to ban bicycles on the newLRTsystem during rush hours.

It was also one of the rare times the city has decided not to take the cautious route.

That's not really the way Ottawa usually rolls.

But something about this issue led council, which followed the lead of the transit commissionthat started this mini-revolt last week, to actually try something a teeny bit gutsy.

• No bikes on LRT during peak hours, staff report recommends
• Transit commission goes against staff report and allows bikes on LRT at all times

Instead of mimicking other Canadian cities and a few major U.S. ones likeBoston and Chicago by barring bicycles on the light-rail systemduring rush hours, council decided to, well, see how it felt to be leading on something.

"Imagine that Ottawa would try something that nobody else has, and show that it can work," saidCoun. DavidChernushenko,one of this council's cycling advocates.

"Ortry itand be the city that was known to be daring, but then realized that they had to restrict things a little bit afterwards. I'm comfortable with that."

He points to the experience of riders on the current O-Train, who've been able to take bikes on at all times since its inceptionwithout issue.

"Ottawa doesn't put itself out there very often,"he said.

"On something as minor as this, I think that's a good thing to do."

Fourteen of his colleagues, including the mayor, agreed with him.

But just because this action seems minor after all, it doesn't cost any money, and we can go back to Plan A if it's all an unmitigated disaster that doesn't mean there's nothing at stake here.

The reason that transit staff recommended limiting the hours that bikes can be brought on the trains isn't because they have it in for cyclists.

It's because they have a lot on the line when it comes to making the transition from bus toLRTgo as smoothly as possible for tens of thousands of commuters.

Standing room only on newLRT

Now that we appear to have a reasonably firm Confederation Line operating date of late November, staff areampingup their communications plan to prepare riders for what they can expect when they step onto our new $2 billion transit system on Day 1.

One thing commuters may be surprised by, no matter how many times staff is saying it now, is that the trains will be packed during rush hour.

Yes, even on the first day of service.

"It's going to be a vast transition for the majority of our customers," saidCoun. StephenBlais, who chairs the transit commission and was the only member there to vote in favour of the staff recommendations.

If you come in from the suburbs during rush hour, you may get on a bus that you ride all the way towork. And you may be sitting the entire way.

That will change withLRT, where you'll nowhave to transfer from a bus onto a train at Tunney's Pasture station in the westand Blair station in the east.

When you get on the train, you might be standing. Which you didn't have to do before.

So transit staffare expecting some cranky commuters. It's no wonder they'd like tominimizecomplaints and conflicts any way they can.

Because there will be conflicts.

Train every 5 minutes, 2 bikes per train

I remember covering a council meeting years ago where there was a huge dispute about parents bringing big strollers onto the bus.

There was even some talk about regulating the size of a stroller that would be allowed on transit.

Councillorswisely abandoned that plan, but not before there were ugly words thrown around about who has a right to be on a bus.

In New York City, where bikes can be taken on thesubway at any time, the transit agency virtually begs riders not to bring their bikes onto the subway during peak periods.

Former mayor MichaelBloombergonce said if he had absolute power, he'd ban bikes on the the trains and he was a huge cycling lane advocate.

Now, we're not New York. And we'll have stricter rules, too.

Our trains will hold 600 people on two cars, and there will be a designated area in the first car where bicycles will be allowed.About two or three bikes willfit in this area.There are an additional seven "cooperative seating areas" toaccommodate riders with strollers and mobility devices.

When thebicycle-designated space isfull,riderswithbikes willbe expected to wait for the next train which is supposed to arrive a merefive minutes laterduring rush hour.

With a little luck, it will all work itself out. After all, the old stroller wars settled down. Or maybe the whole matter will have to be revisited later.

In the meantime, though, let's applaud council for making a (somewhat) bold decision.

It's not that transit staff were wrong to propose caution that's a laudable public-service instinct.

But from elected politicians, a little calculated risk-taking reminds us that a city needs a spirit of innovation, too.