Businesses still requiring proof of vaccination risk challenges, constitutional experts say - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 03:48 AM | Calgary | -12.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

Businesses still requiring proof of vaccination risk challenges, constitutional experts say

One constitutionaland humanrights lawyer says they believe businesses who continue enforcing proof of vaccination "for a long period of time" are going to lose income.

Operators could face discrimination claims, loss of customers

Ontario's vaccine passport system was introduced last fall but was lifted as of Tuesday. Some experts say businesses who keep enforcing it may lose income in the long run. (Sam Nar/CBC)

Ontario businesses cankeep asking customers for proof of vaccination against COVID-19 even thoughthe province no longer requires it but could face challenges in doing so, constitutional law experts say.

Ontario restaurants, gyms and movie theatres no longer have to check customers' proof of COVID-19 vaccination as of Tuesday.

The Verify Ontario app will remain available for businesses to use, a spokesperson for the province's Ministry of Health confirmed to CBC. People can still download a copy of their vaccine certificate,the spokesperson added.

CBChas asked the ministry to clarify if newly-vaccinated people will be able to generate vaccine certificates and is awaiting a response.

Premier Doug Ford asked people to be kind as some businesses continue with the practice.

Businesses can lay down rules but not discriminate

Businesses are allowed to impose conditions on patrons, said Montreal-basedconstitutionaland humanrights lawyer Julius Grey.They can require customers to have footwearor not dine in bathing suits, for example.

But they're not allowed to discriminate, so whether non-vaccination against COVID-19is an issue under the Charterof Rights and Freedoms or Ontario's human rights code "could be disputed," Grey added.

'It is a form, I think, of perhaps well-intentioned obstinacy to keep doing it,' says constitutionallawyer Julius Grey, about businesses who are still asking customers for proof of vaccination, (CBC)

ErrolMendes, aprofessor of constitutional and international law at the University of Ottawa, said if businesses feel it's necessary to continue asking for vaccine passports for the safety of customers and employees, they are entitled to do so.

"However, there are limitations," he said.

Mendes pointed to a policy statement released last fall by the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which assertedthat businesses have a duty to accommodatepeople who can't be vaccinated for medical reasons "unless it would significantly interfere with people's health and safety."

People with medical issues should bring an exemption document from a doctor or nurse with them to a business, the commission added in its statement.

Law professor Errol Mendes says those who don't have medical exemptions may have a hard time challenging businesses still requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination, under the Ontario Human Rights Commission. (CBC)

Patrons arguing that their "personal, singular belief" precludes them from getting vaccinated and having a certificate may face a tougher time waging their challenge, Mendes said.

"There is now increasing acceptance by [the] Ontario Human Rights Commission and other commissions across Canadathat you have to show that it is part of some type of organized or recognized religion," he said.

Some Ottawa businesses have said they're pressing on with vaccine passports, at least for now, in order to give customers peace of mind about sharing space with otherswho are vaccinated.

Grey said that's a tenuous hope given the vaccine passport system will no longer be consistently applied.

"A single store will not give the security because as you leave it and you go to the next store, you no longer have that requirement."

Not everyone will keep carrying their proof of vaccination with them, he added.

"I think people who keep enforcing it for a long period of time are going to lose business," said Grey."It is a form, I think, of perhaps well-intentioned obstinacy to keep doing it."