Reactor's neighbours alarmed over radioactive toxins in river

Indigenous communities, environmental groups and other concerned citizens who monitor toxicwaste areincreasingly concerned aboutthedumpingof radioactive matter and other contaminants into the Ottawa River from an inactive nuclear reactor northwest of the capital.

A scientific report released in February details the dumping of thousands of litres of watercontaminated with radioactive tritium, PCBs and other toxins into the river from the inactive nuclear power demonstration (NPD) reactor in Rolphton. Ont.,about 200 kilometres fromOttawa.

The contaminants are atlevels above Ontario and Canadian surface water quality standards, according to the report.

It was written by geoscientistWilf Ruland, whowasretained by the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council to review the proposed decommissioning of the demonstration reactor.

Radioactive tritiumdumped

"The site is so close to the Ottawa River, only being 100 metres [away],and for usthe environment and the water are two of our priorities," said Norm Odjick, the tribal council's director general.

In the report, Ruland notes releases of contaminated water into the river "appear to have been ongoing for decades and [continue]to the present day."

"The regulatory guidelines for surface water quality were vastly exceeded in the contaminated water being dumped untreated into the Ottawa River from the NPD facility in 2015."

Ottawa RiverkeeperMeredith Brownsaid radioactive tritium has been dumped into and diluted by the river, butcannot be filtered out or treated like other toxins.

Discharge below limit, CNL says

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) is a private-sector consortium that runs Canadian nuclear facilities owned by the federal government, including the demonstration reactor at Rolphton.

CNL maintains the contaminants it releases into the Ottawa River fall well below allowable limits.

"The discharge limits of tritium are 10,000 times below the actual dose limits that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission requires us to meet," said MegganVickerd, the reactor's decommissioning manager.

But just what makes an "acceptable" limit is a matter of debate.

Ole Hendrickson, a scientist and researcher for the group Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area, questions the safety of the discharge limits for the facility.

Regulations vs. impact

"Aquatic organisms are being exposed to very high concentrations of toxic substances, and there's nothing to stop boaters from drawing and filtering river water near the discharge point for drinking," Hendrickson said.

Hendrickson also pointed outOntario's limit for tritium in drinking water greatly exceeds limits in other jurisdictions, and is thousands of times higher than natural levels.

"They release it at a rate so that they will always be below the drinking water quality standards, which in Canada are really high for tritium," Brown said.

"They're making really sure to meet their regulatory obligations based on release limits, based on diluting it in the Ottawa River," she said.

"Meeting the regulations is not the same as environmental impact."

Nuclear history

Thereactor at Rolphton made history in 1962 as the first in Canada to produce electricity from nuclear power. It stopped operating in 1987,and now CNLis developing a plan to decommission the site and deal with the nuclear waste.

That plan involves entombing the reactor in a form of concrete grout and capping it with an engineered barrier.

Vickerdsaid CNL is now two years into that planning process,and recently submitted a draft environmental impact statement to provincial and federal authorities.

Environmentalists, Indigenous groups and scientists have been reacting to that initial plan to entomb the nuclear waste, and worry about future contamination of the river.

The NPDreactor "will remain a radiological hazard for tens of thousands of years," according to nuclear scientistJim Walker in his submission to the nuclear facility's operator.

Walker is one of several retired scientists to submit their concerns.Ruland's hydrogeologicalreport was also sent to CNL.

Hendrickson said entombment is only supposed to be used in emergencies according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and doing so at Rolphtonwill set abad precedent.

• Plan to entomb Manitoba's nuclear waste worries environmentalists

ButVickerdsaid that so far,CNLhasn't "seen any red flags."