Councillor's bid to protect airport forest cut down - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 11:26 AM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

Councillor's bid to protect airport forest cut down

A motion that would have made the protection of a red pine forest on Hunt Club Road a condition for the Ottawa airport authority toreceivemillions in tax breakshas failed at city council.

Tax incentive for redevelopment of airport lands won't be tied to fate of 4-hectare forest on Hunt Club road

Nearby resident Sylvia Bakker, who walks through the Hunt Club forest regularly, says she knew development here was always likely.
A woman walks through the Hunt Club forest in this photo from 2021. Coun. Riley Brockington tried to protect the forest as a condition of a community improvement plan for the airport, but his motion was voted down by council Wednesday. (Celeste Decaire/CBC)

A motion that would have made the protection of a red pine forest on Hunt Club Road a condition for the Ottawa airport authority toreceivemillions of dollars in tax breakshas failed at city council.

On Wednesday, River ward Coun. Riley Brockingtonmoved a motion tyingthe passage a proposedcommunity improvement plan (CIP), which aims to spur development and post-pandemic economic recovery at the airport through taxincentives, to the preservation of the roughly four-hectare woodland.

His motion, seconded byGloucester-SouthgateCoun. Diane Deans,would have allowed theCIP only once an agreement to protect the trees at 1000 Airport Parkway Privateand 400 Hunt Club Rd. was reached.

"We're going to enter into an agreement that will have significanteconomic benefits to the airport and their future tenants, in the tens of millions of dollars," Brockington said.

"It's fair to say ... in return we would like those 10 acres to come off the table."

Locals want to protect trees

The forest is on lands currentlyunder control of the Ottawa International Airport Authority, but is notpart of the area covered by the CIP.

It's a site locals have fought to save in the past, rallying against plans for a BMW dealership to pave over a section in order to expand its parking lot.

But city staffpushed back on Brockington's motion, and Mayor Jim Watson said it would show bad faith.

"I think it's highly inappropriate to tie the two together," Watsonsaid. "I think it's unfair of us now, at the last minute, to throw in something that would, in essence, kill the CIP."

The red pine woodland is at 400 Hunt Club Road and covers roughly four hectares.
The red pine woodland at 400 Hunt Club Rd. covers roughly four hectares. (Google Maps)

Stephen Willis, the city'sgeneral manager of planning, said staff support saving the forest, but they also believe the two matters shouldn't be linked, adding they're working on both the CIP and a plan to preserve the trees.

Staff received direction from council to look at a potential land swap with the airport. Those discussions are ongoing.

Brockington's motion failed 17-7, with councillorsTheresaKavanagh, CatherineMcKenney, Jeff Leiper, Rawlson King and Shawn Menard also voting in favour.

Willis said theairport has had about 100 hectares of land sitting "underused for many years" because the property is owned by Transport Canada and can't be sold.

Menardcritical of tax break

The CIPoffers anyone willing to lease and redevelop thatland anannual property tax incentiveof75 per cent, available for up to 25 years to a maximum of $25 million. To qualify, any redevelopment must add at least $250,000 to the assessed value of the property.

It's hoped the incentivewill eventually boostboth tax revenue for the cityand revenue for the airport, which can use the money to attract new routes and destinations.

Council voted 20-4 in favour of the CIPdespite criticism from some membersincludingCapital ward Coun. Shawn Menard.

"We are giving away taxpayer dollars at a time where our own revenue streams and our own finances are under strain," he said.

"We keep talking about affordability in this city but then do the exact opposite for future tax breaks for Porsche dealerships, or airports."