Darouze used power to 'bully and intimidate' Facebook critic, report finds

Coun. George Darouzetried to silence awoman who criticized him on social media duringlast fall's municipalelection by writing to her husband's boss,the chief of police, according to a scathing report from the city's integrity commissioner.

Darouze is thefirst councillor to be found guilty of violating the code of conduct since Robert Marleau was named integrity commissioner in 2012.

Among other findings, Friday's report describes the Osgoode councillor's actions as "unjustified and excessive," calls his version of events "not credible" and says the major motivationbehind his letter-writing "was to bully and intimidate" the complainants and "cause grief" for the police officer at work.

Claimed woman was 'spreading fear'

The complaint was filed in March by an Osgoode-area woman and her husband, an Ottawa police officer.

After a September 2018 all-candidates debate, the woman took to an Osgoode village Facebook group to disagree with some of Darouze's claims that he was responsible for certain improvements to local policing.

• ELECTION 2018: Rural representation an issue in Osgoode ward debate
• ELECTION2018: Official complaint lodged in Osgoode race over anonymous website

"You never changed where police are dispatched from," the woman posted. "Osgoode town and the whole zone has always been out of Leitrim station, not Orlans."

She opined that although two officers were officially assigned to Osgoode and the outlying areas, they were often called to the city "if stuff hits the fan."

"It makes memad that [the councillor] thinks there is enough police coverage."

Darouze replied on Facebook that "spreading fears and misleading our community is not cool. I take this very seriously!"

He accused the woman of posting "incorrect information" and asked to meet with her and her "inside source family member" namely, her husband, the police officer.

Darouze made that connection, the report said, despite the fact the womanused her maiden name on social media.

Post was 'not misleading'

Twelvehours later, Darouze wrote toCharles Bordeleau, then Ottawa's chief of police, to complain.

In the letter, Darouze accused the woman of using "scare tactics" to upset the community. The councillor suggestedBordeleau look into whether "her husband is relaying incorrect information to her to scare the public."

Darouze alsogave the chief the couple's names and contact information.

Bordeleauthen forwarded the email to the appropriate inspector and staff sergeant on Oct. 4.

After reviewing Darouze's letter and the woman's Facebook post, the senior officers determinedthe information in the post "was accurate and not misleading," according to the integrity commissioner's report.

They also determined that the woman had not shared any confidential information. In other words, despite Darouze'sletter, the woman had done nothing wrong.

Her husband, the report said, was shocked to hear about the councillor's actions, as he doesn't use social media and was unaware of her exchange with Darouze until his superiors showed him the letter.

While the officer wasassured that "no action" would be taken based on Darouze's letter, it would nonetheless remain on his file.

Two issues considered

The integrity report looks at two questions related to the code of conduct: whether Darouze improperly obtained personal information about the complainants to further his private interests, and if hisemail to the chief amounted to "bullying, harassment or intimidation."

On the first issue, the integrity commissioner decided no.

The councillor explained he'd first met the woman about a property-related issue in 2015, and she'd used her married name in that exchange. A short while later, he met an officer"with the name tag bearing the same last name as the complainant" at a local fair and connected the two.

The integrity commissioner found that"on a balance of probabilities," Darouze didn't contravene the code with regards to abusing private information.

Discrimination and harassment

But the report could hardly come down harder on Darouze with regards to whether the councillor bullied, harassed or discriminated against the couple.

Darouze's explanation for writing the letter was "not credible," Marleau's report found,and the "major motivation of the councillor was to bully and intimidate the complainants."

[It was written] forthe primary reason of silencing the female complainant and causing the male complainant grief in his workplace.- Excerpt from Robert Marleau's report

Not only was theinformation in the woman's Facebook post accurate, the Osgoode councillor produced zero proof of any alarm over policing in the village in the 12 hours between the post and the email to the chief.

"When asked repeatedly how many calls he received from constituents responding to the Facebook exchange in that short time he then advised he might have received two calls," according to the report.

When he was first questioned by the investigator, Darouze said he wrote the letter to "get clarity for himself and his constituents on police deployment."

However,Darouze never once followed up for "clarity," the report said.

Darouze motivated by re-election campaign

During the investigation, the councillor initially denied the municipal election had anything to do with his motivation for writing to the chief.

But Darouze later admitted that policing was a major issue being raised by his opponent.

In fact, the same woman had written an earlier postin 2017 where she also asserted that there were not enough officers in the rural area around Osgoode. If anything, the language in that post was harsher, and referred to the chief as a "moron."

And yet, Darouzeknew about that post and had no problem with it, Marleau's report concluded.

The report found thatthe woman simply "expressed an opinion as any citizen is entitled to do," and that Darouze's reaction was "unjustified and excessive."

The report also found that the fact Darouze wrote the chief and identified them both by name including the police officer was "for the primary reason of silencing the female complainant and causing the male complainant grief in his workplace."

Councillor accepts 'full responsibility'

In his report, Marleau also said he "is of the opinion that Coun. Darouze does not believe his actions crossed a line."

However, after the report came out, Darouze issued a statement saying he accepted "full responsibility" for his actions and had written an apology to the couple.

He also said he'd asked police to remove the email he'd sent Bordeleau from the officer's file.

The integrity commissionerhad, in fact, recommended council direct Darouze to write a "sincere"apology to the complainants and ask the new police chief to withdraw that communication. His report also recommended council"reprimand" Darouze as laid out in the code of conduct.

That code allows council to among other things suspend a councillor's pay for up to 90 days.

"I accept the recommendation for council's reprimand as a fitting penalty for my actions in this instance," Darouzewrote. "I will continue to work hard for the residents in Osgoode ward and hope to regain any trust that might be lost as a result of my actions in this matter."

Council will receive the report and vote on any penalties next Wednesday.