Former N.S. Liberal government accused of politicizing judges' salaries - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 25, 2024, 11:13 AM | Calgary | -15.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Nova Scotia

Former N.S. Liberal government accused of politicizing judges' salaries

The Nova Scotia government has been ordered to take another look at the salaries it pays provincial and family court judges.

Province ordered to look at salaries it pays provincial and family court judges

A brown door with a blue and grey sign is shown.
In a decision released Wednesday, Justice Ann Smith of the N.S. Supreme Court criticized the process the McNeil government used in setting judges' remuneration, saying 'there is plenty of evidence' it was politicized. (Robert Short/CBC)

The Nova Scotia government has been ordered to take another look at the salaries it pays provincial and family court judges.

The order comes from a justice of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court who quashed a salary contract imposed by the former Liberal government of Stephen McNeil. In a strongly worded decision released Wednesday, Justice Ann Smith criticized the process the McNeil government used.

"The question before the court is whether the government politicized the process of setting the judges' remuneration," Smith wrote. "There is plenty of evidence before the court that it did."

The dispute dates back to February2017, when the McNeil government issued an order-in-council imposinga three-year wage settlement that included a one per cent wage increasecoupled with a two-year wage freeze.

The order-in-council overruled a recommendation from an arms-length salaries and benefits tribunalthathad been set up expressly to make recommendations on judges' remuneration free from political interference. Until the McNeil government amended the legislation governing the tribunal, its recommendations had been binding.

The McNeil government argued the provincial treasury couldn't afford the sort of salary recommendations the tribunal had been making. The wage settlementthe government imposed on the judges was in line with contracts for other public servants. The tribunal had recommended a salary increase of 9.5 per centfor judgesspread over three years.

Smith found the government order failed to properly consider the nature of judges' work.

"This court finds that the [order-in-council]did not engage in any meaningful way with the unique nature of judicial office. Its focus on its fiscal plan and its public sector wage mandate seems to have blinded it to its constitutional responsibility to do so."

The judge said the government's determination to stick to its fiscal plan made the whole tribunal process meaninglessbecause submissions made on behalf of the judges were not properly considered.

This battle went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canadaas the government tried to prevent the release of its report and recommendationsthat led to the order-in-council.

Canada's top court ruled the government had to release portions of the report and recommendationsto lawyers representing the judges. Itincluded details of the communications strategy the government was to use to defend its actions.

That strategy included the argument that the tribunal's recommendations are "simply unaffordable," and that when it comes to fiscal restraint, "we all have a part to play."

Average salary $238,513 in 2019

Current Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston said his government will need time to study the court decision before deciding whether to appeal it. But he was highly critical of the McNeil government's actions in this case.

"The separation and the respect for the justice system is critical," Houston told reporters Wednesday at Province House.

"I think the former government at a few times showed ... that they didn't really respect the justice system. I think this would probably fall into that category as well."

Nova Scotia has 24 provincial and family court judges and there are four vacancies. Their average salary, as of 2019, was $238,513.