CBRM to release port contract details after privacy commissioner's report - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 02:21 PM | Calgary | -10.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Nova Scotia

CBRM to release port contract details after privacy commissioner's report

Cape Breton Regional Municipality's solicitor says he disagrees with the Nova Scotia information and privacy commissioner's ruling last month that CBRM was breaking the law when it withheld hundreds of pages in a freedom of information request. But he says CBRM will comply with the ruling, for the most part.

Solicitor says CBRM doesn't believe it broke the law by withholding documents but will release more

CBRM council's last meeting was held Dec. 8 at Centre 200 and the mayor says the next meeting is tentatively scheduled for Jan. 26. (Tom Ayers/CBC)

The Cape Breton Regional Municipality hopes to release most of the documents related to an exclusive port marketing contract five years after a journalist requested the details through a freedom of information request.

The municipality's regional solicitor,Demetri Kachafanas, said he disagrees with a recent report by the province'sinformation and privacy commissioner that found CBRM broke the law when it withheldhundreds of pages related to the request.

Nevertheless, he saidthe file isbeing reviewed with an eye towarddisclosure.

"It's five years after the application, so I don't know what's still relevant or not, but it's our hope that most, if not all, of the documents will be disclosed," Kachafanassaid in an update to council this week.

CBRM released 28 pages

In 2015, independent journalist Mary Campbell asked the municipality for documents on its decision to award the marketing contract to a private company called Harbour Port Development Partners.

The municipality came back with 28 pages. After a review, privacy commissioner Tricia Ralph said CBRM failed to conduct a proper search, unnecessarily withheld 862 pages and failed to locate more than 41 others.

Coun. Gordon MacDonaldurged staffto release most of the documents this week, saying the lack is disclosureis unacceptable to taxpayers.

"It allows everybody in the public to wonder what the heck we're hiding, and I, for one, wonder what we're hiding when we're redacting that much information," said MacDonald. "I suggest that the municipality throw it out on the table. Let them see what they want to see."

Coun. Eldon MacDonald agreed most of the information should be released, but he said the municipality signed legally binding non-disclosure agreements with Harbour Port Development Partners, now known as Sydney Harbour Investment Partners orSHIP.

"That entity deserves the respect of allowing that file to be gone through and looked at to make sure what's being released is not going to jeopardize any of their proprietary negotiations," he said.

SHIP says it's close to deal

SHIP principals Albert Barbusci and Barry Sheehy won the exclusive right to market Sydney's port in an attempt to attract international partners in a proposed container terminal.

The company has said it is close to announcing a deal, but the province first needs to guarantee the discontinued rail line across Cape Breton Island will be upgraded and maintained.

In her report, Ralph said CBRM should go back and conduct a proper search and then release all the records.Kachafanas said Jim Gogan of Breton Law Group, the municipality's port file counsellor, initially recommended holding back most of the information.

Regional solicitor Demetri Kachafanas says the vaccination policy needs to stay in place, in case the province has to reinstate public safety measures. (Tom Ayers/CBC)

The municipality needs the next 60 days to go through the nearly 900 pages of documents to ensure there is no longer any need to keep them confidential, said Kachafanas.

"That's why we want to go through them again. I don't think it's to hide anything, but it's to make sure that we're not disclosing anything that shouldn't [or] can't be disclosed," he said.

The information and privacy commissioner's office only has the power to recommend and cannot enforce its recommendations.

The office said the applicantwould have to go to court in a bid toforce the municipality to complyif they wantto pursue the matter further.

Campbell said she is weighing her options, but is waiting to see how much information CBRM releases before deciding what to do.

MORE TOP STORIES