Federal Liberals launch counterattack on critics of carbon tax

Families out for a stroll along Dartmouth's Shubenacadie Canal had to sidestepa podiumon Thursday as federal Minister of Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipSean Fraser lambasted critics of his government's carbon tax.

Fraserwas therealongsideLiberal MP Lena Metlege Diab, who represents Halifax-West,to speak to reporters about the rebates coming as early as next week to offset the extra costsassociated withOttawa's price on carbon, whichwas imposed on July 1.

"There's abundant misinformation, disinformation," said Metlege Diab.

"We're here to help cut through some of the noise," said Fraser, who referencedcritics of the levy andthe measures designed to offset thecost.

"I'm pleased to share that, beginning next week, Nova Scotians will receive a direct cash rebate from the federal government in the amount of $248 for a family of four or for an individual, $124," saidthe MP for Central Nova. "These are quarterly payments. These payments are going to arrive every three months."

"What we've seen is a policy that guarantees that the biggest polluters pay the most, and that most families are left better offas a result of this policy being in placebecause they receive rebates that are greater than the fuel charge that they will be required to pay," he said.

Fraser dismissed criticism from the federal and provincial Tories, singling out federal Conservativeleader Pierre Polievreas the "chief" spreader of misinformation.

"There's all kinds of of ridiculous suggestions when it comes to the cause of climate change among Conservative members of parliament," said Fraser, who also pointed the finger at the Houston government, which he said has offered "troubling commentary" on the issue.

"The reality is the rebate, for most families, will leave them in a better position."

The Nova Scotia government has spent $56,000 on a radio and online campaign designed toblame the Trudeau government for theincrease in gasoline, heating oil and diesel prices.

"Nova Scotians want strong action on climate change," says the 30-second radio spot. "But can't afford to pay more at the pumps."

Crunching the numbers

A new analysis by Dalhousie University professor Larry Hughes lends some support to the claim that not everyone will fare well under the new system.

Using a fictitious family of four, Hughes, whose area of expertise is energy security, suggests families who live in a drafty old home and heat with oil will be out of pocket by the end of thisyeardespite the rebates.

"The family of four would be out about $500 for an older home," Hughes told CBC News. "You fare best if you have electric space heating, electric hot water."

According to the study, those who live in an R-2000 home and have electric heat would end the year having pocketed $236. Owners of a so-called "average home" would end up with $168 more than they paid.

Fraser urged those who heat with oil to take advantage of the rebates and incentive programs aimed at encouraging peopleto switch from oil to heat pumps.

He suggested those who didn't would have to live with the consequences.

"If people make a choice not to take advantage of the programs we put forward and they still decide to use home heating oil, their expense could be greater. But the reality is for most people we expect that they're going to receive more in the rebates than they pay in a fuel charge," Fraser told reporters.

Hughes said the switch might be too costly for some families if they are "already struggling to purchase a heat pump, and on top of that they have this deficit caused by the carbon tax."