N.W.T. MLA questions business incentive policy that rewarded southern business - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 10:19 AM | Calgary | -16.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

N.W.T. MLA questions business incentive policy that rewarded southern business

Inuvik Twin Lakes MLA Lesa Semmler is asking how a contractor not registered under the territory's business incentive policy beat out four other bidders who are, to win a duplex construction job in Inuvik.

Industry minister says companies not registered as N.W.T.-based can enjoy same privileges as those that are

MLA Lesa Semmler is calling on the minister responsible for Housing NWT to re-award an Inuvik duplex construction contract to a company registered under the territory's Business Incentive Policy. (Natalie Pressman/CBC)

An N.W.T. MLA is askinghow a contractor not registered under the territory's business incentive policy beat out four other bidders who are, to win a duplex construction job in Inuvik.

To beregistered under the Business Incentive Policy (BIP), a companymust prove that its ownership is at least 51 per cent in the Northwest Territories. When competing for contracts, BIP-registered companies receive bid adjustments to give them preference over non-BIP companies. The goal is to keep taxpayer money in the territory.

Not only did the non-BIP registered company beat out registered companies, it benefitted from the same kind of bid adjustments given to those registered companies.

The company that won the bid,6240 O/A Beaufort Construction, is not listed under the BIP registry. Nonetheless, it was awarded the $1.45 million contract. A document shared with CBC by Inuvik Twin Lakes MLA Lesa Semmlershows that had the company not received BIP adjustments, it would have lost the bid to a BIP-registered company.

Beaufort Construction, which lists an Inuvik address and another in Edmonton, did however have its bid BIP adjusted along with its competitors, according to tender and award documents.

A spokesperson for the department of Industry, Tourism and Investment (ITI) the department which maintains the BIP registry confirmed that the company was not BIP registered, but did not explain why the company appeared to have received BIPaccommodations.

But in the legislative assembly Thursday, ITI Minister Caroline Wawzoneksaid non-BIP companies can be given BIP adjustments if they commit to using local subcontractors.

According to Inuvik companies, however, Beaufort Construction isn't using Inuviksupplies and labour for the project.

In a document tabled in the legislature Wednesday,four Inuvik companies signed a lettersaying the awarding of the duplex contract is "cause for serious concern."

The letter waswritten by Irvin Perry, owner of Co-fly Construction Ltd., who missed out on the bid, and signed by three other Inuvik-based businesses who provide mechanical, plumbing and heating services (not businesses who had bid on the project). The letterasksthe minister of ITI to "question the legitimacy of a southern company getting almost the same BIP evaluation as a local registered BIP company."

The letter called foran urgent response and said that "if notstopped immediately," overlooking BIP businesses for northern contacts "will erode the BIP policy that is meant to bring long term commitment and investment to the N.W.T."

A screenshot from OpenNWT shows that Beaufort Construction beat out four other bidders to win a duplex construction contract in Inuvik. The company is not currently listed in the territory's business incentive policy registry. (screenshot Open NWT)

MLA Semmler is calling on Paulie Chinna, the minister responsible for Housing NWT, which awarded the contract, to review the process that allowed this to happen, pull the contract and re-award it to an appropriately BIP'd company.

"It goes against everything that we said we were going to do as a government to encourage the local economy," Semmler told CBC News. "Especially after COVID."

She also said there needs to be accountability to ensure companies that say they're going to employ local suppliers do as they say.

She said that someone should be reviewing companies and ensuring their actions align with their promises.

If a non-BIP company agrees to use local contractors to offset costs, "who's holding them accountable?" she asked.

"If we're expecting our people, our local companies to be BIP'd, then we should be following it and those contractors that are following all of the processes should be rewarded for that."

During an exchange in the legislative assembly Wednesday, Chinna told Semmler she was surprised to learn the successful bidder was not on the BIP registry. She told the assembly she would follow up with Housing NWT "to make sure these obligations are met."

Chinna said she would "exercise penalties if that's appropriate." The agencywas not immediately available to clarify what kinds of penalties could be imposed.

Company awarded 23 bids since 2016

Semmler said the issue goes beyond just this contract.

With housing deemed a top priority for this assembly, Semmler said there's going to be an influx of housing projects.

"If it's not going to be also benefiting our local contractors who live, pay taxes, raise their families here and hire local, then what are we doing?"

According to OpenNWT a site dedicated to making government reports accessible 6240 O/A Beaufort Construction was awarded the contract for the two-storey duplex on Sept. 21. The companyis listed as having 23 successful bids totalling $9.2 million in the N.W.T. since 2016.

According to OpenNWT, the construction company does have a BIPIDnumber. When searched in the territory's BIP registry, however, none of the company's four names leads to any results.

DavidWasylciw,the founder of OpenNWT,said the BIP data on his site is out of date since it can be hard to know when a company is removed from the BIP registry.

He said that if his site shows the company was BIP'd, it means they were registered in the past, but if they don't appear on the registry it means they were dropped. That could bebecause they wanted to or because they no longer qualified.

Looking at Beaufort Construction's BIP IDnumber, Wasylciw said it looks like the company was BIP'd prior to 2017 but that he doesn't know when they were dropped from the registry.

No onefrom Beaufort Constructionwas available for comment.