Tch concerned after N.W.T. rejects Wek'eezhii's initial plan for Diavik reclamation - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 04:54 AM | Calgary | -13.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

Tch concerned after N.W.T. rejects Wek'eezhii's initial plan for Diavik reclamation

The Tch Government expressed concern over the N.W.T's decision not to approve an application by Diavik Diamond Mine to begin a process ofprogressive reclamation.

The proposal was to begin flooding pits and return the altered drainage to its natural state

Aerial photo of open pits on an island surrounded by blue water.
The Diavik Diamond Mine on the edge of N.W.T.'s Lac de Gras. The mine is preparing to cease operations in 2025, part of that involves flooding the mined out pits and connecting those pits to the lake. (Rio Tinto)

The Tch Government expressed "concern" over the N.W.T's decision not to approve an application by Diavik Diamond Mine to begin a process ofprogressive reclamation.

The Tchraised its issue with the decision in a letter dated July 27, stating the problem isaround jurisdiction.

The letter was addressed toShane Thompson, the minister of environment and natural resources, claimingheis ignoring the treaty by rejecting a recommendation by the Wek'ezh Land and Water Board, the land management authority for the area created after the Tch agreement.

"With respect, it is not the role of Public Government neither GNWT nor Canada to unilaterally dictate the approach that the Board must take in any particular licensing proceeding. To do so undermines the clear spirit and intent of the Tch Agreement and undermines the very idea of co-management," wrote Brett Wheler, a director with the Tch Government department of culture and lands protection.

Shane Thompson, N.W.T. minister of Environment and Natural Resources, didn't approve an application for Diavik to return the mine to its natural drainage system. (Mario De Ciccio/Radio-Canada)

Whelerspoke withCBC News on Dec. 15.

"The specific questions about Diavik's water license were kind of an example of issues and questions that we have about roles and responsibility," he said.

The decision was in regards to a water licence amendment Diavik applied for as part of its progressive reclamation plan these arereclamation tasks being completed while the mine is still operating.

One of those aspects includes changing the state of collection ponds, which collect seepage around the mine. Diavik applied to allow these mines to drain naturally, meaning it would flow into Lac de Gras.

This was originallyscheduledto begin in the summer of 2021. In its latest public consultation document, Diavik saidlate summer, or early fall, 2023 is now the tentative start date.

Public consultation

The initial application, that was rejected, included a public consultation period where the mine stated its plan, which draining the collection ponds has always been part of.

Waste entering the lake was a major topic and establishing a numerical limit was where the N.W.T. disagreed with the board and theTch.

Part of the plan involved testing the water to prepare for when the pits are flooded and reconnected with the lake. Testing and treatment is expected to take place after the flooding begins. But mixing the ponds into the lake was expected to give the mine early insight.

A transcript of a public hearing in February 2022 quotes Gord Macdonald,a Diavik representative:

"If we can decommission those ponds now, it will give us an opportunity to monitor the chemistries and monitor the how that water mixes within Lac de Gras."

However, in these consultations and in its filing, the territorial government expressed concerns with the process Diavik had laid out, particularly around a lack of details on the measurement of how much wastecould end up in Lac de Gras.

"I'm not sure how our minister could support a water licence amendment with unregulated discharge of waste into the environment," saidRick Walbourne, a representative with the department, according to a transcript from anotherpublic hearing in February 2022.

The disagreement centred on both sides having differinginterpretation of the Waters Act.The board wrote that there were other ways to regulate and monitor the amount of waste that could enter the lake, whereas the territorial government wrote it needed to be measured in a specific manner.

In the end, theWek'ezh Land and Water Board recommended the minister sign the application on June 2.The board wrote it wasunclearthe N.W.T.'srequirement "offers any additional protection"and included other regulations in its licence.

But on June 29, the minister did not approve the licence, citing the same issues the territorial government had found in the public consultation phase.

The application

The Tch then issued its letter to Thompson, detailing what it felt was flawed interpretation of legislation and a disregard for the Tch Agreement.

The application Diavik filedwas for an amended water license, for the mineto increase its water usage from Lac de Gras. This would allow the mine to allow the collection ponds to drain, but would also allow the mineto begin flooding the pits, which has also always been its reclamation plan.

TheWek'ezh Land and Water Board also filed a letter to Thompson, disagreeing with the decision. On Oct. 19, the board again recommended Thompson approve the licence, but also offered an alternative:that he approve a licence that allowspit flooding, but not the collection pond drainage, which he approved.

Now the the collection pond drainage is back to public consultation, which is expected to take around nine months.

Wheler said theimplementation of the TchAgreement is paramount, which is why that letter was issued, so the other partners have respect andsupport for the board so it can achieve its agreement.

He also said that issues raised in the letter aboutthe minister'searlier decision"are important issues that that we need to continue working on with our treaty partners."

CBC News reached out to Thompson for an interview, but one was not granted.