No-layoff clause good for N.L. economy, finance minister argues - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 11:48 AM | Calgary | -13.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
NL

No-layoff clause good for N.L. economy, finance minister argues

Newfoundland and Labrador Finance Minister Tom Osborne says a no layoff clause for public sectors workers is actually good for the provincial economy.

Tom Osborne says older workforce means government can get better results through attrition

Tom Osborne is Newfoundland and Labrador's minister of finance. (Eddy Kennedy/CBC)

Finance Minister Tom Osborne says a no-layoff clause in a tentative collective agreement withNewfoundland and Labrador's largest public sector union is actually good for the province's fragile economy.

If government were to follow the advice of groups like the St. John's Board of Trade, Osborne said, thousands of government workers would zip up their wallets and the economy would practically grind to a halt.

"We cannot afford to have fear in our public service that there will be mass layoffs. We cannot afford to have people wondering'Who's next?'and not spend," Osborne told reporters on Friday.

The provincial government has taken the unusual step of guaranteeing therewill not be large-scale layoffs during the duration of the collective agreement,which is designed to give a sense of job security to some 20,000 members of the Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees.

If approved, it will protect jobs until at least March 31, 2020.

"We don'tneed to put fear in real families where they don't buy cars, they don'tbuy sofas, they don'tshop, they don't go out to dinner. That's what we don't need, and that's what the board of trade is asking," said Osborne.

Osborne guarantees deal will be ratified

NAPE members are now holding ratification votes throughout the province, with a result expected by early February.

The clause has sparked criticism from the board of trade, which saidgovernment has given up its ability to manage its financial affairs at a time when the province faces troubling annual deficits andan unprecedented level of debt.

Dorothy Keating is chair of the St. John's Board of Trade. (Sherry Vivian/CBC)

Osborne accused board of trade chairDorothy Keatingof fear mongering and creating unnecessary division, but also suggested another outcome.

"She's taken a contract that was good for both sides, that NAPE were concerned on whether or not they'd be able to get this contract agreed to, and she's guaranteed that we'll have ratification," Osborne said.

Osborne said the core government workforce estimated at 8,000 employees in mid-2017 has been reduced by six per cent over the past two years, largely through attrition.

The planisto follow that same pattern over the next 24 months, he said.

NAPE president Jerry Earle came out swinging Friday aginst criticism of his union's tentative agreement with the provincial government. (Bruce Tilley/CBC)

Osborne has also directed all agencies, boards and commissions with roughly 37,000 employees to come up with attrition plans to reduce what is the largest public sector workforce, by capita, of any province in Canada.

"Why would we get rid of our youngest employees through layoffs when we know we have an aging workforce and the ability to find attrition measures is there?" said Osborne.

"Why would we hurt the economy by having people not spend their money because they're afraid they're going to lose their job?"

Osborne predicts big savings for province

He called the tentative agreement an "excellent deal" for the province and public sector workers, at a time when unemployment numbers are on the rise.

In agreeing to the no-layoff clause, Osborne said government negotiated terms that will mean big savings, including a full-on wage freeze for the entirety of the agreement, which is a first for the province.

The elimination of severance will cost government some $240 million in lump-sumpayments, but will eventually mean savings of $25 million annually.

And changes to health benefits for new employees will also save "considerable money" in the future, Osborne explained.