Explorers or passengers? Things to know about testimony on the Titan sub disaster - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 02:18 AM | Calgary | -14.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
NL

Explorers or passengers? Things to know about testimony on the Titan sub disaster

Last year, five people hoping to view the Titanic wreckage died when their submersible imploded in the Atlantic Ocean. A Coast Guard panel that's investigating the Titan submersible disaster is in its second week of testimony.

Lead engineer says he refused to pilot doomed submersible

A submersible is seen diving
Five people hoping to view the Titanic wreckage died when OceanGate's titan submersible imploded in the Atlantic Ocean last year. (OceanGate Expeditions/Handout/Reuters)

Last year, five people hoping to view the Titanic wreckage died when their submersible imploded in the Atlantic Ocean. A U.S. coast guard panel that's investigating the Titan submersible disaster is in its second week of testimony. Previous witnesses provided testimony that raised serious questions about whether warning signs were ignored by the submersible's owner OceanGate.

Here's what witnesses have been saying so far:

NASA and Boeing officials on Thursday described what they called their limited roles in the creation of the doomed submersible Titan even though the co-founder of OceanGate previously touted ties to NASA and aerospace manufacturers.

Justin Jackson, a materials engineer, said NASA was unable to fulfil a role in building and testing the carbon fibrehull because of the COVID-19 pandemic. He said NASA officials were uncomfortable with being linked to the experimental submersible, saying "our folks had some heartburn" when OceanGate suggested NASA's endorsement.

Boeing was involved in an early feasibility study of the use of carbon fibrefor Titan's hull and in OceanGate's acoustic sensors on the hull before the relationship ended. Mark Negley, material and process engineer at Boeing, said OceanGate ultimately departed from some of its recommendations on the pressure hull.

'Urgency' to complete dives

A key OceanGate employee pushed back at a question from a coast guard investigator focusing on whether the company felt a sense of "desperation" to complete the dives because of the high price tag.

Amber Bay, director of administration for OceanGate, insisted Tuesday that the company would not "conduct dives that would be risky just to meet a need." That said, she told the panel, "There definitely was an urgency to deliver on what we had offered and a dedication and perseverance towards that goal."

She also referred to clients as "mission specialists" and "explorers," not passengers. She tearfully noted that she knew all of them.

"There's not a day that passes that I don't think of them, their families and the loss," Bay testified through tears.

OceanGate'sco-founder told the panel Monday that he hopes the tragedy yields a renewed interest in exploration.

"This can't be the end of deep ocean exploration," said Guillermo Sohnlein, who helped found OceanGate with Stockton Rush. Rush was among those killed in the implosion.

He said the company was started with a laudable goal: "We wanted to give humanity greater access to the ocean, specifically the deep ocean," Sohnlein said.

A collage of headshots of four men.
Four of the five people onboard the Titan were Pierre-Henri Nargeolet, top left; Shahzada Dawood, top right; whose son Suleman was also on board; Hamish Harding, bottom left; and Stockton Rush, bottom right. (Getty, Reuters)

'Susceptible' to failure

Roy Thomas of the American Bureau of Shipping testified about challenges associated with carbon fibre, which was the material used for the pressure hull of the doomed submersible. He noted that carbon fibreis difficult to manufacture and salt water can damage and weaken the material in multiple ways.

He said there's no recognized standard for a submersible carbon fibrepressure hull for human occupancy and that carbon fibreis "susceptible to fatigue failure under repeated external pressurization."

When testifying about a dive that took place several years before the fatal accident, lead engineer Tony Nissen said he felt pressured to get the Titan ready and he refused to pilot it.

"I'm not getting in it," Nissen said he told Rush. Nissen said Rush was difficult to work for, made demands that often changed day to day, and was focused on costs and schedules. Nissen said he tried to keep his clashes with Rush hidden so others in the company wouldn't be aware of the friction.

Malfunctioned prior to fatal dive

Scientific director Steven Ross said that on a dive just a few days before the Titan imploded, the vessel had a problem with its ballast, which keeps vessels stable. The problem caused passengers to "tumble about" and crash into the bulkhead, he said.

"One passenger was hanging upside down. The other two managed to wedge themselves into the bow," Ross testified.

WATCH | 'Very, very close' death:

'Oceangate came very, very close to killing me': Titan passenger tells hearing

17 days ago
Duration 3:19
Karl Stanley of the Roatan Institute of Deepsea Exploration told the U.S. Coast Guard of his trip inside the Titan submersible, and says if he had known the truth, he would have never boarded the vessel. The CBC's Heather Gillis reports on the findings from Tuesday's hearing.

He said nobody was injured but it took an hour to get the vessel out of the water. He said he didn't know if a safety assessment or hull inspection was carried out after the incident.

A paid passenger on a 2021 mission to the Titanic said the journey was aborted when the vessel started experiencing mechanical problems.

"We realized that all it could do was spin around in circles, making right turns," said Fred Hagen. "At this juncture, we obviously weren't going to be able to navigate to the Titanic."

He said the Titan resurfaced and the mission was scrapped. Hagen said he was aware of the risks involved in the dive.

"Anyone that wanted to go was either delusional if they didn't think that it was dangerous, or they were embracing the risk," he said.

'Very little' science

OceanGate's operations director David Lochridge said the tragedy could possibly have been prevented if a federal agency had investigated the concerns he raised with them on multiple occasions.

Lochridge said that eight months after he filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), a caseworker told him the agency had not begun investigating and there were still 11 cases ahead of his.

By that time, OceanGate was suing Lochridge and he had filed a countersuit. A couple of months later, Lochridge said, he decided to walk away from the complaint. He said the case was closed and both lawsuits were dropped.

"The whole idea behind the company was to make money," Lochridge testified. "There was very little in the way of science."

After Lochridge's testimony this week, OSHA responded that, at the time, it had "promptly referred" his safety concerns to the cogst Guard.

Renata Rojas, a member of the Explorers Club which lost two paid passengers in the fatal dive, struck a different tone with her testimony.

She said she felt OceanGate was transparent in the runup to the dive and she never felt the operation was unsafe. A passenger on a previous dive, Rojas was volunteering with the surface crew when the Titan imploded.

"Some of those people are very hardworking individuals that were just trying to make dreams come true," she said.

Download ourfree CBC News appto sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador.Click here to visit our landing page.