Winnipeg lawyer loses appeal after facing discipline in residential school survivor case

A Winnipeg lawyer who said he failed to respond to emails because they ended up in his spam folder has lost his appeal of a professional misconduct finding against him.

The Law Society of Manitoba reprimanded and fined Louay Alghoul after finding him guilty of professional misconduct for failing to respond to a series of emails sent to him by an adjudicator overseeing residential school survivor cases.

The lawyer appealed that decision in December.

On March 8, Justice Michel Monnin of the Manitoba Court of Appeal decided to uphold the law society's original punishment, saying that Alghoul did receive the emails sent by the adjudicator and that the society's finding of professional misconduct was reasonable.

Alghoul appeared before aLaw Society of Manitobadiscipline panelin 2016 after he failed to respond to four emailsover a six-week period fromadjudicator Carolyn Frost about his client's compensation claim for abuse at a residential school.

Alghoultold the panel those emails ended up in his spamemail box when his company switched email addresses from a ".ca"address to one ending in ".com."

"I have been a very good lawyer," AlghoultoldCBCNews, saying he has worked hard to earnhis reputation.

"I've helped so many survivors in residential school cases and it's not right to tarnish my namebecause of fouremailssent to the wrong email address," he said.

"Having received [theemails] in my junk email box is not the same as receiving them," saidAlghoul, comparing it to a personal letter being delivered to a neighbour.

Alghoul said he apologized to Frost, notingshe did not follow up on the emails. He said if the adjudicator had contacted him in any other way, he would have responded immediately.

The responsibilities of adjudicators in residential school survivor compensation claims include work such as hearing testimony of claimants, rendering compensation decisions, and reviewing legal fees to make sure they are fair and reasonable.

Reprimand too harsh: Alghoul

Under cross-examination, Alghoul told the discipline panelhe did respond to other messages sent to his old email address, but those messages did not end up in his spamemail box.He also was paid his legal fees of about $15,000 in 2013, despite the fees not being reviewed by the adjudicator due to lack of information requested in the four emails.

The information needed to approve the fees was not given to Frost until March 2014. Frost said she had no concerns about the amountAlghoul received in legal fees.

Alghoultestified he has handled about 650 residential school claims and said the problem was an isolated incident.

The discipline panel did not agree and fined Alghoulthe cost of the proceedings (about $28,000)and issued an official reprimand.

You are telling professionals that if you receive an email [in yourspambox] there is no duty on the sender to follow up and to make sure that your message is received.- LouayAlghoul

Alghoul appealed the findings on Dec. 12, 2017, saying "if his conduct was discourteous or disrespectful, it was not serious enough to warrant a finding of professional misconduct," according to the decision rendered by Monnin.

"As for the penalty imposed, the respondent contends that a reprimand was too harsh for minor breaches of civility rules."

Alghoul also said due to an allegederror by the discipline panel, the time needed for the hearing increased dramatically and "that he should not bear these additional costs."

Monninultimately rejected Alghoul'sappeal, stating that Alghoul did receive the emailsand the panel was within its rightsto reject Alghoul's explanation for missing them. Monninalso found the Law Society of Manitoba's finding of professional misconduct reasonable.

"The adjudicator's evidence was that she sent the respondent four email messages requesting information that she required to conclude a legal-fee review," Monnin wrote in his decision.

The adjudicator also testified that due to the lack of response, she received Alghoul's time records five months late, did not receive other requested information andcould not complete a review on the fees he charged, wrote Monnin.

He then agreed with the Law Society of Manitoba's assessment that Algoul's lack of response was a"failure to treat a tribunal with candour, courtesy and respect and that it interfered with the adjudicator's ability to conclude the hearing."

Considering other options

Alghoultold CBChe is considering taking the case further, saying he has spent tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees for his defence, and said losing the appeal opens the floodgate to liability for professionals.

"You are telling professionals that if you receive an email [in your spam box] there is no duty on the sender to follow up and to make sure that your message is received."