Kinew's coronation as NDP leader comes with tough questions

There may never be a moment of clarity where anyone can truly know why the police charged Wab Kinew with two counts of assault in 2003.

Kinew says it never happened and the woman who alleged the attack, Tara Hart, has only her word and the support of her family (who spoke to the Winnipeg Free Press) to back up that he threwher across a room and caused severe rug burns to her legs.

• WabKinewspeaks out after anonymousemailsdisclose past charges
• Woman at centre of Wab Kinew domestic assault allegations says she was thrown

Attempting to look into Kinew's pastleaves the public with a gap in their knowledge that makes it difficult to draw any final conclusions.

As Kinewmoved into his new office as Leader of the Opposition Monday, instead of reveling in a moment or focusing on where he will take his party into the future, he again faced questions about events from 14 years ago.

He reiterated Hart's version of events was incorrect, but emphasized he was sorry he'd caused her family the trouble.

When asked specifically what he remembers of the events Hart described, Kinew answered this way:

"I know what is being alleged, and when I think back to our relationship this was somebody who was important to me and there weren't incidents like what is being described, but I do know it takes a lot for people to make a statement; to come forward. And so I do realize that because I put my name on a ballot that this issue did get brought up again for some people. For the family as well. I do accept responsibility for that,"Kinewsaid.

• Details emerge of Kinew's assault, drunk-driving charges

Kinewwouldn't elaborate any further and has stated in previous interview he doesn'tremember why the Crown stayed the charges against him.

CBC News asked the prosecutor in charge of the case in 2003 why it didn't go further and was told it was not a public matter.

There were few detailsin the court file beyond dates, times and places of the proceedings. It shed little light on what actually may have occurred or why the case was eventually stayed. Transcripts of the appearances were requested but providedno further clarity.

Retrying a case from 14 years ago in the court of opinion without the advantage of evidence, lawyers and a judge we havehit a wall of missing facts.

That doesn't mean many people haven't decided for themselves. Adebate is happening in many corners of Manitoba.

In the aftermath of Kinew'svictory Saturdayone of his Indigenous supporters, clutchinga sheaf of eagle feathers and a purple Kinewsign, said she was "totally 100 per cent behind Wab" and saw his victory as a "great visionfor the youth ... the male youth who are struggling with the law and violence and addiction. That they can come form that place and be anything they want to be," she said.

But a scan of social media shows there is nothing near a consensus on Kinew'spast or his ability to be a changed man.

Bloggersand Facebookers and Tweeters have chimed in both believing Kinew'sversion of events andsupportingTara Hart and her family. Some are angry at the NDP for not standing up for an alleged victim of domestic violence.

Clearly someone is wrong. These events (which prompted an investigation and charges) either happened or did not. At this time it seems impossible to ever know with certainty.

Perhaps that underscores the complexity and crisis of so many domestic violence cases (Manitoba is second in the country for these incidents) for law enforcement, courts and victims. Proving it happened or didn't is difficult and traumatic for those involved.

And then there is the overlay of politics. Kinew's leadership rival Steve Ashton repeatedly demanded more details of the incident, only to fall silent on the matter at the last minute in his speech to delegates at the convention.

• Wab Kinew should 'own up' to domestic violence charge, says NDP leadership rival Steve Ashton

The Progressive Conservative party waited scant minutesafter Kinew was ordained leader of the NDP beforepressing play on a website containing a scattershot of his past Tweets and lyrics from rap songs, focusing on some of the more egregious misogynistic and homophobic comments he's made.

NDP delegates were armed with much of this information before they voted overwhelmingly on Saturday for Kinew.

But the next vote the rookie leader of the opposition will face is by the province, in an election.

Political scientist and U of M professoremeritus Paul Thomas says he's never seen a situation like this in Manitoba or even Canadian politics, where a newly minted leader of a party faced such scrutiny.

"I mean here we have the major political party choosing a major Indigenous leader and within half an hour the attack ads are directed at him so they don't even get to savour the euphoria, the victory. It's right into defending yourself," Thomas told CBC News.

Thomas saidKinewwill have to do more than apologizeand Monday afternoon in his new office the rookie leader acknowledged that is true, pledging again to live by example and prove his worth to Manitobans.

Kinewsays he may even reach out to Tara Hart and her family, but not in a way that would be public.

But will voters in 2020 have answers to whether Kinew did harm his former girlfriend? So far, that has proved impossible to determine.

And will Manitobans be able to decide if Kinew, as he and his followers maintain, has indeed become a changed man, and rehabilitated himself? If his apologies are sincere?

Also a debate with more than one side.