Mediator scolds University of Manitoba Faculty Association for rejecting arbitration to end strike

A mediator has slammedthe striking University of Manitoba Faculty Association for refusing to accept binding arbitration in its labour disputewith the university, saying there is nofurther value in mediation.

Arne Peltzrecommends arbitration since "there is no likelihood that the parties will reach a settlement of outstanding differences without a protracted continuing strike."

In hisfinal recommendation, which was released to media by the U of M Friday, Peltz says the university has accepted his recommendation. The faculty association has not, despite nearly four weeks of mediation.

"The parties remain far apart. I therefore reiterate my recommendation that all outstanding differences be referred to binding interest arbitration," he said.

Interest arbitration can be especially useful where there are innocent third parties seriously impacted by a strike,as students are in the U of M strike.

Many of their classes have been put on hold since the faculty association, which represents over 1,200 professors, instructors and librarians at the Winnipeg-based university,went on strike Nov. 2.

Peltz says in this case, monetary and operational issues are still outstanding.

Hedrafted a customized arbitration referral that he believes is fair to both parties.

Return to work agreement recommended

It recommends asole arbitrator be mutually appointed by both parties, with one appointed bythe chair of the Manitoba Labour Board if they can't reach an agreement.

If the referral is accepted, UMFA and the U of M would conclude a return to work agreement as quickly as possible, with UMFA ending the strike.

UMFA and the U of M are encouraged to continue to negotiate while waiting for the arbitration hearing, which could prompt a settlement before the hearing,Peltz's recommendation says.

The referral also addresses the faculty association's complaint that the U of M has the second-lowest average salaryamong the the U15 a collective of 15of Canada's most research-intensive universities.

Under Peltz's recommendation, the arbitrator would "consider the parties' mutual aim to achieve reasonable advancement in the U15 standings toward the 25th percentile" over the duration of the collective agreement.

The faculty association has also accused the province of interfering in the collective bargaining process.

To address that, Peltz's recommendation says "government-issued mandates will not be considered by the arbitrator, but governance proposals will be considered so long as they aim to achieve a fair and reasonable result."

Peltz urged the faculty association to reconsider binding arbitration.

"There is no need for this strike to continue. If it does, this will not be because of a restrictive government mandate or employer intransigence," hesaid in his recommendation.

"Like the University [of Manitoba], UMFA should be willing to subject all its proposals to scrutiny before an independent arbitrator and to live with the result."

Bargaining continuing: UMFA

UMFApresident Orvie Dingwallsaid the association isopen to continuing to bargain with University of Manitoba administration.

In a statement sent to CBC, Dingwall said any agreement needs to prioritize recruitment and retention at the U of M.

She met with U of M president Michael Benarrochearlier Friday and the two agreed that bargaining will continue into the weekend, albeit without a mediator.

"UMFA remains open to arbitration if certain issues relating to governance and working conditions for our members can be resolved beforehand," Dingwall's statement said.

"We remain committed to bargaining in good faith directly with the administration."

She also said university administration rejected UMFA's proposals Thursday night in part because "the mediator failed to adequately communicate information regarding our most recent proposals to the administration."