Manitoba chief proposes class action against feds over 'effectively worthless' $5 treaty payments

A Manitoba First Nation chief is joining a growing list of Indigenous communitiesthat allege the federalgovernment has violatedtreatyagreements by not increasing $5 annuity payments to keep up with inflation over the past 150 years.

Waywayseecappo First Nation Chief Murray Clearskyis seeking class-action status for his claim against the federal government,filed withManitoba Court of King's Bench on Jan. 26.

He alleges the Crown breached and continues to breach its obligations under Treaty 4 by keeping $5 annuity payments to treaty membersthe same since the agreement was first signed in 1874, "causing the purchasing power of the annuities to dwindle to the point where it became only a token or symbolic sum," the statement of claim says.

In a news release Tuesday, Clearsky said the launch of his proposed class action is "vital in addressing the historical wrongs inflicted upon the Treaty 4 First Nations" and ensure that the Crown's promisesto treaty members "are not just made, but honoured."

Clearsky, who would be the lead plaintiff in the proposed class action,aims to represent 33 First Nations in Treaty 4, which spans about 195,000 square kilometres across present-day southeastern Alberta, southernSaskatchewanand west-centralManitoba.

The suit names the Attorney General of Canada as the defendant.

None of the allegations have been proven in court, and astatement of defence has not been filed.

In a statement sent to CBC News on Wednesday, a spokesperson for Crown-IndigenousRelations and Northern Affairs Canadasaidthe department is reviewing the statement of claim.

"Canada recognizes that more needs to be done to renew the treaty relationship and remains open to looking at ways to advance this important work," said spokespersonSuzanna Su.

Last year, three other First Nations in ManitobaLake Manitoba First Nation in Treaty 2, Fisher River First Nation in Treaty 5 andRoseau River Anishinaabe First Nation in Treaty 1 each filed similar lawsuits.

Other chiefs in Treaty 4 have also filed lawsuits in the Federal Court of Canada.

Canada 'continues to break' treatypromises: suit

The Crown entered into Treaty 4 with various Saulteaux, Cree and other First Nations in 1874, the lawsuit says.

The terms of the treaty included annual payments to allmembers of the First Nations that signed or adhered to the treaty and their descendants.

The payments were intended to compensate the members of the First Nations for the loss of exclusive use of their territory and to ensure the well-being offuture generations.

The amount was set at $5 per member each year, which in 1874 was an amount that "commanded material purchasing power and was not merely a token or symbolic sum," according to the statement of claim.

It saysthe First Nations were of the understanding that the annuities would reflect the "same degree of purchasing power" as when the treaty was first signed.

"The First Nations parties to Treaty 4 did not and could not have known that the real value of a cash payment of $5 in 1874 would be drastically reduced in real terms with the passage of time," the suit says.

"The parties to Treaty 4 never intended for the annuities to be frozen in time."

The suit alleges that by failing to increase the annuity payments,the federal government has allowed the payments to become "effectively worthless," meaning"Canada has broken, and continues to break, its promise to beneficiaries of Treaty 4."

The proposed class action is seeking $100 million in damages, compensation for "unpaid or underpaid" annuities, andchanges to the annuity agreements so that the payments are adjusted regularly, along with other relief.