Lawsuit claims baby's brain damage caused by negligence at HSC - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 24, 2024, 02:45 AM | Calgary | -12.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Lawsuit claims baby's brain damage caused by negligence at HSC

A Winnipeg couple has launched a lawsuit against the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, claiming several staff members, including doctors and nurses, were negligent in caring for a pregnant woman.

Winnipeg couple suing WRHA after induction appointments delayed, baby born with brain damage

A Winnipeg couple claims the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority was negligent in the final weeks of a woman's pregnancy. (CBC)

A Winnipeg couple has launched a lawsuit against the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, claiming several staff members, including doctors and nurses, were negligent, which led totheirbaby boy sustaining severe brain damage.

The pregnantmotherwas seen by a doctor and discharged from Winnipeg's Health Sciences Centre (HSC) more than a dozen times over the course of two weeks in 2011, court documents state.

She was first scheduled to be induced on Feb.22, 2011, but the appointmentwas cancelledbecause HSC was too busy, the documents say. The mother then returned to the hospital every day for a week. Each day, drugs were administered to trigger labour, but the medicationfailedand she was discharged, the documents state.

The motherwas then told the hospital would admit her onMarch 2, but the appointmentwas cancelled "due to an increased number of inductions on the unit," state the court documents.

A second attemptonMarch 5to deliver the baby was called off because there were 10 inductions scheduled.

On March 6, the woman was again admitted to hospital and the process for inducing labour was started, but it was stopped more than12 hours later. It's not clear why that attempt was halted, but the mother was again sent home, state the court documents.

The pregnant woman returned tothe hospital March 9 after noticing the baby was not moving as much as usual, said the documents. A caesarian section was ordered after another round of labour-inducing drugs did not work.

The baby boy was not breathing when he was born and noheart rate was detected. He wastransferredto the neonatalintensivecare unit, where he experiencedseizures.

The boy was discharged from hospital on March 22, 2011, and ispermanentlydisabled, court documents state. He suffers from brain damage due to lack of oxygen, severe cerebral palsy and seizures.

The couple, in the suit, claimthe hospitaland its staffwereincompetent.

Along with delays in careand the unit being too busy, the lawsuit claims the hospital didn't have the proper communication protocols, staff didn't keep adequatenotes, specialists were not consulted, and the motherwas notadvisedofavailable treatment options.

The statement of claimwas filed recently in Court of Queen's Bench in Winnipeg.

A statement of defence has not been submitted and none of the allegations have been proven in court.

The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority said in a statement the claim has been passed on to their insurer.