How a statue debate can (re)write history - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 10:41 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Kitchener-WaterlooAnalysis

How a statue debate can (re)write history

As the prime minister statue debate simmers in Waterloo, a similar conversation about monuments to early Canadian leaders has arisen in Halifax.

Wilfrid Laurier University's debate over statues, history and monuments now mirrored in Halifax

Wilfrid Laurier president Max Blouw and sculptor Ruth Abernethy sit with the Sir John A. Macdonald statue. Abernethy included over 30 symbols on the piece, which represent Macdonald's personal life, political triumphs and scandals. (@LaurierNews/Twitter)

The debate over whether to knock statues of controversial figures off their pedestals has erupted again in Canada, as history writers and academics in two cities differ over how the present should influence the honouring of the past.

In Ontario, the discussion has centred around the installation ofa series of statues of prime ministers on the campus of Wilfrid LaurierUniversity in Waterloo.

Jonathan Finn, a faculty member leading the charge against theproject, says a group of students and academics object to theproject for a variety of reasons, including the record of Sir JohnA. Macdonald regarding aboriginal Canadians.

The final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission ofCanada concluded that Macdonald's government espoused policies of"cultural genocide" that separated many aboriginal children fromtheir families.

"This is a program of representation that does something, incelebrating only white males, that we've moved away from decades anddecades ago," said Finn.

A spokeswoman for the university said in anemailthat anadvisory committee is reviewing options for the project and willpresent its findings to the board of governors.

LoriChalmersMorrisonsays that when the project receivedinitial approval, it considered the possibility of extending theproject to other leaders, including aboriginal and female rolemodels from history.

Meanwhile, in Halifax...

The fight over monuments was revived recently in Nova Scotia whenthe province's premier said he'd like to meet with Halifax's mayorabout a figure of Edward Cornwallis that towers over a south endpark.
Edward Cornwallis's statue was erected in the 1930s. (CBC)
The plaque notes that Cornwallis founded the city in the 1700s,but doesn't mention a scalping proclamation he issued against theMi'kmaq which promised "a reward of ten Guineas for every IndianMicmac taken or killed, to be paid upon producing such Savage takenor his scalp."

Some historians, such as David Bercuson at the University ofCalgary, caution against judging the actions of the past with thestandards of the present.

But Jon Tattrie, the author of Cornwallis: the violent birth ofHalifax, says he counts himself among Canadians who want to see amore diverse depiction of their past in public spaces.

"Shouldn't our publicly funded art be about education and notabout propaganda from one point of view? It's about wanting morevoices heard and more perspectives woven together," he said.

"Really,the solitudes that our generation is charged withbridging is between European cultures and First Nations cultures."He said he's sympathetic to the perspective of Daniel Paul, aMi'kmaq elder and author who has argued the monument should beshifted from its position in the centre of the city into a militarymuseum on Citadel Hill.

Premier Stephen McNeil, who is also the minister of aboriginalaffairs, has said the Liberal government will work withmunicipalities and the Mi'kmaq "to ensure that our history isreflected, but done so in a respectful way."

Statueof limitations

Bercuson, who teaches at the University of Calgary, says he'swary of assessing past misdeeds through a modern lens."It is a difficult yardstick to measure people's actions by. Wehave to be extremely careful about how we want to cleanse ourhistory," he said in an interview.
Sculptor Ruth Abernethy included over 30 "Easter eggs" in the statue - symbols that represent key moments in Sir John A. Macdonald's personal and political life. (Albert Delitala/CBC News)

"I'm Jewish. What do I do about John A. Macdonald? He was avicious anti-Semite. Am I advocating that his name bechiselled offof buildings and we take him off our money, no I'm not."

"We have to study him for what he was. See him in the fullnessof his existence and draw our own conclusions about what kind ofperson he was. We have to remember he helped to build the country."

John Boileau, a former military officer and the author of severalbooks of military history, has attended Tattrie's public talks onhis Cornwallis book and criticized his viewpoint.

"I think they should leave well enough alone," he says. "Thewarfare ... was brutal. Men, women and children were killed on bothsides," he said in an interview.

Boileau said one of his greatest concerns is over where the pushto remove historical monuments will end.

"(George) Washington owned slaves. (Thomas) Jefferson ownedslaves. Are you going to knock their faces off various bills?"