Television City towers are too tall, planners say, but the developer is already appealing

A sky-scraping Hamilton condo development is in for a fight now that the city seems poised toreject its rezoning. But the big-name developer behind it says he's already appealed it to a provincial boardanyway.

Nothing ever goes easily or smoothly,especiallywhen you want to build beautifulbuildings.- Brad Lamb

City planners say councillors should reject Brad Lamb's proposal for Television City, two planned condo towers of 40 and 30 storeys at 163 Jackson St. W.

The towers wouldn't fit with the surrounding neighbourhood, says astaff report coming to city council's planning committee Tuesday. And they'reincompatible with plans already laid out for the neighbourhood.

Jason Farr, Ward 2 councillor, says he's thought that "right from the get go."

"When I first met Brad and sat with him and staff, I suggested it might be a little too much on such a tight site."

"I have not in my time seen so much (public) feedback contrary to a proposal."

But Lamb says he'snot surprised or deterredby the staff report. That's why he appealed the project to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) Thursday before next week's vote has even happened.

Now "what (councillors)think and feel is not irrelevant, but it's not the guiding course," said Lamb, who has four Hamilton projects in various stages.

"Nothing ever goes easily or smoothly,especially when you want to build beautiful buildings."

Television City, by all accounts, would permanently change the Hamilton skyline.

The two buildings, taller than the escarpment, would hold a combined 618 units, plus four ground-floor commercial spaces. It would also have 397 parking spaces for vehicles and 500 for bicycles.

The development is called Television City because it's located at the formerCHCHTelevision studios. The plan incorporates the historic building there now, calledPinehurstResidence. The first tower, Lamb says, is sold out.

The proposal does help meet the city's goal of intensifying the downtown, the report says. But the twin tower concept is "over intensification."

The buildings don't "complement the surrounding massing, patterns, rhythm or character" of the neighbourhood around them, the report says.

The design also doesn't provide a height transition to the mostly two-storey buildings around it, which is typically done with a podium design.

Lamb dismisses the idea of the terraced look.

"There's a serious ailment going on in planning departments acrossCanada," he said."It's called podium-itis."

If new buildings only fit with the ones next to it, he said, nothing would ever get built.

Lamb says heappealed to the OMB already because the Liberals aredoing away with the board next year. The government will replace it with a Local Planning Appeals Tribunal, which is seen as less developer friendly.

Lamb says he'd rather negotiate Television Citydetails with city staff. But he has to appeal while there's still an OMB.

"If KathleenWynne's governmenthad not pulled the plug on the OMB,we would not be going to the OMB," he said. "Between the parties involved, there's absolutely going to be a settlement."

The staff report lists other issues.

People using balconies, it says, couldlook down into the backyards of single-family homes next door. And the towers will partially block the sun on surrounding sidewalks.

And the city's draft downtown secondary plan which will go public Monday only allows for 12 storeys in that location.

Any decision committee members make Tuesday will have to be ratified by city council on March 28.