Peter Khill defence grills forensic pathologist who testified about how Jon Styres may have been shot - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 07:36 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Hamilton

Peter Khill defence grills forensic pathologist who testified about how Jon Styres may have been shot

PeterKhill's defence lawyer peppered an expert witnesswith questions, asshe testified on Friday in Khill's second-degree murder trial.

Khill is facing second-degree murder after shooting Styres in February 2016 in Hamilton

Jon Styres, right, was shot and killed in Hamilton on Feb. 4, 2016. Peter Khill is on trial for second-degree murder. (Facebook)

WARNING: This story contains distressing details.

A forensic pathologistsaysshe thought Jon Styres fell to his hands and knees after being shot in the chest by Peter Khill,before Khill fired again for a second and final time.

The statement by Dr. Jane TurnerpromptedKhill's defence lawyer,Jeffrey Manishen, to pepper Turnerwith questions, asshe testified on Friday about what she thought happened theFebruary night in 2016 when Styresdied.

Khill is facing a second-degree murder charge after shooting Styres, who was trying to steal Khill's truck at his home in a rural part of Hamilton.

The jury heard that Turner reviewed Styres's autopsy, a blood stain pattern analysis and crime scene photos.

Dr. Allison Edgecombe, who testified a day prior, was responsible for that autopsy.

What the forensic examiner thinks happened

Turner said it would be reasonable to conclude thatStyres was standing at the truck, facing into the passenger compartment before Khill confronted him.

She said he probably turned to his left, saying Khill shot him at an angle of lessthan 90 degrees.

"He then collapsed onto his hands and knees and then was shot in the back of his right upper arm," Turner told Crown prosecutor Sean Doherty.

Khill has pleaded not guilty, arguing he was afraid for his life when he shot Styres twice. The Crown says Styres didn't deserve to die over an old truck.

A gun.
Hamilton police officer Tim Knapp testified he removed this gun from the Peter Khill's home on the night Styres was shot. (Ministry of the Attorney General)

Describing how Styres may have been when he was first shot,Turnersaid she could tell the chest shot was the first one because there was visible hemorrhaging in the right lung after that shot which means blood was flowing to the lung and would indicate Styres's heart was stillbeating.

That same hemorrhaging, Turner said, wasn't seen when the second gunshot lodged a pellet into Styres's right kidney.

She said that would mean blood wasn't flowing to the organ because Styres's heart already stopped beating a point that would be especially scrutinized later on.

She said she thinks Styres was standing at the truck and turned to the left because of the shape of his chest wound, the fact the pellets travelled toward the right side of his body and because there was no blood splatter on the inside of the passenger door and toward the front of the truck.

She also said she thought Styres was on his hands and knees because he had mud on his hands, knees and tips of his shoes in crime scene photos.

'Your answersare still the truth?'

In cross-examination, Manishentried to castdoubt onher explanation.

He said the scenario she painted wasone of many possible scenarios.

Manishen said Styres could've got mud on his hands and knees while he was punching in the lock of Khill's passenger side door with a screwdriver.

"That's a reasonable scenario, isn't it?" Manishen asked Turner.

"Yes," she said.

He also said instead of being on his hands and knees, Styres could've been bent over after being hit with the first shotgun blast.

Stickers marking blood stains on a truck with an open passenger-side door.
Exhibits from Peter Khill's second-degree murder trial show there wasn't any blood found on the inside of the passenger-side door or toward the front of the truck. Styres was trying to steal the truck when he was shot dead. (Ministry of the Attorney General)

He also pointed out Turner previouslysaid the "best explanation" was that Styres was stooped forward when he was shot a second time.

"And [your answers then] are still the truth today?" Manishen asked Turner.

"Yes," she said.

Manishen also tried to point out a contradiction in her explanation about when Styres lost his heartbeat.

Manishen said Edgecombe's autopsy noted a hemorrhage in the right kidney, despite Turner saying there wasn't blood flowing toward the organ.

Turner said while she didn't see signs of a hemorrhage, based on Edgecombe's note, it could indicate there would still be blood flowing to the kidney.

Manishen suggested that could show Styres didn't fall after being shot in the chest and could have still be able to move at that point.

Turner said that could be true but Styres collapsing after being shot in the chest was "equally possible."

Manishen also noted Turner hadn't seen a recent supplementary report from the blood stain analysis and suggested she might not have the whole picture.

Doherty re-examined Turner and asked if her opinion on the order of howStyres was probably shot changed based on Manishen's questions.

Turner said her opinion remains the same.

The trial resumes on Tuesday morning.