Delay in first-degree murder trial did not violate prisoner's rights, appeal court rules - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 04:05 PM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Edmonton

Delay in first-degree murder trial did not violate prisoner's rights, appeal court rules

A federal prisoner will stand trial for first-degree murder more than a year after an Edmonton judge stayed the charge, ruling his constitutional rights had been violated due to excessive delays in getting to trial.

Lance Matthew Regan must stand trial in stabbing death of fellow inmate at Edmonton Institution

Lance Matthew Regan is accused of fatally stabbing Mason Tex Montgrand, a fellow inmate at Edmonton Institution, in 2011. The charge was stayed until the Alberta Court of Appeal ordered him Thursday to stand trial. (CBC)

A federalprisoner will stand trial for first-degree murder more than a year after an Edmonton judge stayed the charge, ruling his constitutional rights had been violated due to excessive delays in getting to trial.

The Alberta Court of Appeal ruled Thursday that Lance Matthew Regan's rights were not violated and ordered him to stand trial.

Reganwas accused of fatally stabbingMason TexMontgrand, a fellow inmate at Edmonton Institution, in 2011.

Five years later, on the eve of his trial in November 2016, the judge granted a stay of proceedings citing the "Jordan decision."

In the so-called Jordan framework, there is a "presumptive ceiling" of 30 months between when charges are laid and trial in superior court begins. Any timeline beyond that period puts onus on the Crown to prove the delays were due to case complexity or unavoidable circumstances.

In October 2016, Justice Stephen Hillier found the Crown did not meet that burden of proof inRegan'scase, making it the first murder charge to be stayed in Canada following the "Jordan decision."

Hilliergranted the stay despite the fact that Regan had contributed to about 40 per cent of the five-year delay. Reganhad dismissed two lawyers and had three separate trial dates scheduled.

Fifteen months after Alberta Justice appealed the stay,the appeal court ruled that virtually all of the delay accrued in the case was prior to the release of the Jordan decision, and "it is presumed that the Crown and defence relied on the previous law until Jordan was released."

"In our view, the release of Jordan did not 'transform what would previously have been considered a reasonable
delay into an unreasonable one,' " the court said in a written decision.

The court urged both parties to bring the matter to trial as soon as possible.

Reganremains in prison.