Garbled weather warning alert confusion continues - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 09:59 PM | Calgary | -12.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

Garbled weather warning alert confusion continues

Mispronounciation of towns has cause confusion, and so has the search for who is responsible and how to fix it.

Operators of Alert Ready blame broadcasters' transcription software

The new national weather alert system has caused some hiccups in extreme weather warnings. (@MesocyclonicWX/Twitter)

Ponoadflkna. Ladoiemaod. Can you identify these Alberta locations? Neither could CBC listeners.

Last week an emergency alert was broadcast on TV and radio stations across Alberta, including CBC, warning of tornado activity in Ponoka and Lacombe, but the automated voice made the message incomprehensible.

The reason for the garbled wording is about as clear as the warning itself, but centreson the growing pains of a new national alert system Alert Readywhichbroadcasters have been required to carry since March 31 of this year, and the transcription software used by the media outlets.

"The one that the federal government is using is not as robust yet, and to be fair they've recognized the inconsistencies and technical difficulties around the sound quality," said Tim Trytten, the coordinator fo the Alberta EmergencyAlert and Geographic Information System.

The new national system duplicates the existingprovincial system thatTrytten represents, and whichsent out proper alerts last Thursday.

Trytten said his organization is working with Alert Ready on system issues.

Weather alerts for the newsystemare created by Environment Canada, which sends out a text warning. That text is then picked up and distributed over the system by Pelmorex, whichis responsible for "the distribution infrastructure behind Alert Ready."

"We are not involved in the selection of the text speech system," said Paul Temple, senior vice-president of regulatory affairs at Pelmorex.

Both he and Ken McDonald with Environment Canada lay the blame for the garbled place names squarely at the foot of broadcasters and their respective software, but the issue should not have come as a surprise.

Last year, the broadcasting council expressed concerns over the new national system, saying they wanted recorded messages and not text alerts because they were concerned aboutmispronounciation.

The CRTC responded to the concerns last August, but said that cooperation between Pelmorex and the broadcasters would lead to a solution.

According CBC communications, the network is"working closely with the emergency service partners to fix this issue as soon as possible" and "are looking into improving the quality of the voice delivering the message."

There is no clear direction on who is responsible for fixing the system and ensuring clear messages.

Until that time, keep your heads up Tkasnoiuasd.