Crowsnest Pass voted for coal other Alberta communities don't all share the enthusiasm

Crowsnest Pass residentsvoted decisively Monday in favour of bringing coal back, with more than 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support a nearby coal project.

Though the vote is non-binding, Crowsnest Pass councillors say the vote in support will guide them in the months ahead as they lobby decision-makers to advance the proposed coking coal mine at Grassy Mountain.

"The Crowsnest Pass has made a decisive decision and as mayor and council we will take your position forward to the upper levels of government and through the regulatory process," Crowsnest Pass Mayor Blair Painter told The Canadian Press late Monday.

"This vote was about hearing from and getting direction from our electorate. It is about hearing from the people living here and finding out once and for all, without all the other outside voices, what the people of this community want."

The turnout of eligible voters was 53.6 per cent, compared to just 38.5 per cent in the last civic election.

The proposed mine in southwestern Alberta is spearheaded by Northback Holdings (formerly known as Riversdale Resources and Benga Mining). It's the latest incarnation of a number of corporate entities tied to Australian parent company Hancock Prospecting.

High River sends letter to Alberta premier

Although the feelings of theresidents of the historic mining community are now clear, someAlbertatowns want their views to be considered, too.

On Monday, council members in High Rivervoted unanimouslyto send a letter to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, stating that the Crowsnest Pass referendum shouldn't be the only factor to considerwhen making a decision in regard to coal mining at Grassy Mountain.

The letter goes on to request additional local and provincewide consultationprior to any further consideration or action tied to the project.

Craig Snodgrass, the mayor of High River, said the Crowsnest Pass referendum was the right thing for that community to do, but added his community has its own priorities.

"The letter was intended to just make sure that Premier Smith understands that the referendum, with her decision-making, should hold very, very, very little weight," Snodgrass said.

"Becausethese are mining projects that affect all of Alberta that water that gets pollutedgoes down the Crowsnest Riverinto the Oldman."

Concern around water quality was one of the factors in the federal government's decision to reject the Grassy Mountain coal project in 2021, citing adverse effects"on surface water quality, including from selenium effluent discharge."

Northback Holdings, the company behind the mine, has saidits plan will "ensure management and mitigation systems are in place for elements such as selenium during all project phases."

The big concern for High River has to do with what progress at Grassy Mountain could mean for the rest of the province, Snodgrass said.

"If Grassy Mountain goes, that's where the main load-out is for all the mines north of Grassy that just triggers the domino effect for all these other mines to have access to that railway and that infrastructure," Snodgrass said.

"If Grassy goes, the mines north start to go, and that's where it starts to affect High River's watershed directly."

Cautious support and a legal appeal

Fort MacleodMayorBrent Feytersaid he gave credit to Crowsnest Pass for holding the vote.

He said Northback has spoken to Fort Macleod'scouncil in recent months and has held an open house in the community.

"I think if we can work together on good solutions, hopefully something can happen that works for everyone," Feyter said.

Fort Macleod council hasn't taken an official stance yet on the project. Feyter said that if water was going to be seriously affected in the community, that would raise alarm bells.

"Someone needs to be making sure whatever happens is being done exceptionally well and is not having a negative impact," he said.

Meanwhile, the Municipal District of Ranchland where the proposed coal mine is located, north of Crowsnest Pass has been pushing backagainst the project for months.

The Alberta Court of Appeal will hear arguments from Ranchland that the Alberta Energy Regulator shouldn't have accepted three applications from Northback for work at the site.

A spokesperson for the M.D. wasn't immediately available Tuesday.

Other positions under consideration

In an emailed statement, the office ofMinister of Energy and Minerals Brian Jean said the vote shows there isstrong community support for the economic potential of the project. The statement said the government is looking to strikea balance between preserving theenvironment and water while making sure thereare stringent regulations to allow for responsible coal development.

"Alberta is a province of innovators. We have consistently embraced new technologies to manage our natural resources responsibly and support Canada's economy. Just as we have excelled in responsible energy development, we are equally committed to advancing responsible mineral development," the statement said.

Lethbridge Mayor Blaine Hyggenwasn't available to comment on Tuesday.In a statement, a Lethbridge spokesperson wrote that the city had previously written to the provincial government regarding concerns about potential selenium contamination.

"[The city also wrote about]the need for monitoring and mitigation in the Oldman River headwaters and watershed, as it relates to the deep drilling permit on Grassy Mountain," the statement reads."Letters were sent from the previous city council in 2021 andthe current city council in October 2023."

Pincher Creek Mayor Don Anderbergdeclined an interview request, but he wrote in an email that the current town council has not made a decision on its position. He notedtheGrassy Mountain project has been proposed over three council terms.

WATCH | Crowsnest Pass residents vote in favour of Grassy Mountain coal project:

Crowsnest Pass residents vote in favour of Grassy Mountain coal project

10 hours ago

Duration 1:57

Residents of Crowsnest Pass have overwhelmingly voted to support the development of a nearby coal project. The non-binding vote wrapped up Monday evening.

"As I am the spokesperson for council, it is important that I follow direction from resolutions of council. I will bring this issue forward as an agenda item for discussion,"Anderberg wrote.

A spokesperson with Northbacksaid the company is sincere about its environmental responsibilities, adding all Albertanswill have their chance to have their say as the project moves through the regulatory process.

"We take our environmental responsibilities very seriously, and this vote provides a clear mandate as we move forward with the regulatory process,"Northback spokespersonRina Blacklawssaid in an interview.

"We are going to continue to engage transparently with the municipalities, the residents, the business ownersand the First Nations and all of southern Alberta throughout this process."

TheAERis scheduled to hold a public hearing, starting Dec. 3 and continuing on Jan. 14, regardingNorthback's applications for exploration permits.