Taseko Mines in court to appeal defamation ruling - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 11:06 AM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Taseko Mines in court to appeal defamation ruling

Taseko Mines will be in court today to appeal a 2016 ruling that an environmental organization's criticism of their mining project was not defamation.

Taseko Mines will appeal a 2016 ruling that an environmental organization did not commit defamation

Tasko Mines is back in court to appeal a ruling that the Wilderness Committee did not publish defamatory statements about them. At the initial trial in 2015, Wilderness Committee supporters protested outside the B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. (Tamsyn Burgmann/The Canadian Press)

TasekoMines isin court today to appeal a 2016 ruling that anenvironmental organization's criticism of theirmining project did not constitutedefamation.

The Wilderness Committee, who won the case, argues the lawsuit was designed to silence critics of the company's proposed New Prosperity mine.

"We absolutely need legislation to protect citizens ... from being harassed from companies like this," said Joe Foy, national campaign director for the Wilderness Committee

In the originalcase, the alleged defamatory statementsagainst Taseko Mines originated inthreearticles posted on the Wilderness Committee's website,claimingthe open pit gold and copper mine would turn nearby Fish Lake into a "dump site for toxic tailings."

After Tasekofiled a defamation claim against Wilderness Committee for those posts, the environmental organization posted two more articles, accusing Taseko of filing a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation(SLAPP) lawsuit, which is a type of lawsuit intended to silence oppositional voices.

Taseko Mines claimed these posts amounted to further defamation.

Today, Foy said he hopes Justice Gordon Funt'soriginal 2016 ruling which dismissed the defamation suit is upheld.

"The judge'srulingis quitefulsome," said Joe Foy in an interview on CBC Radio's The Early Edition.

"JusticeFuntgoes through our laws on what Canadians have a right to say and you have many defences. Truth being one of them....you're allowed to say what you believe and the judge confirmed that."

Foy said cases like this could be prevented ifB.C. hadAnti-SLAPPlegislation like Ontario and Quebec.

"We were draggedthrougha five-year, costly ... sometimesscary process. But at least we were an organization," he said.

"If you were an individual afraid of losing your home or your life savings, this would be a terrifying process. And at the end of it we havearuling that we had done nothing wrong."

Taseko Mines did not respond to a request from CBC News for comment.

In the 2016 ruling,Justice Funtdismissed the defamation suit andissued special costs in favour of WC, which Taseko Mines decided to appeal.

The appeal will take place at the BC Court of Appeal on June 7 and 8, and will be webcast live to the public as part of a newpilot project from the Court.

With files from CBC Radio's The Early Edition