Radioactive water and 'fugitive' emissions: LNG project a risky investment, critic says

A proposed natural-gas export terminal in Kitimat, B.C., is slated to add billionsto provincial coffers, but critics think fracking risks don't justify thefinancial boost.

Premier John Horganlast week announced plans to move forward with tax breaks for the proposedliquefiednatural gas project.

If it's approved later this year, the $40-billion project could generate 10,000 jobs and $22 billion in income for the province.

The increased production wouldmeet a "substantial demand" worldwide for a cleaner energy source following the 2015 Paris climate agreement, saidSusannahPierce, a director atLNGCanada.

"Canada was missing out," Pierce said, pointing to a need for natural gas in countries such as Japan and China.

"If we don't produce it here it'll get produced somewhere else," she said. "And they'll be doing it worse."

'Fugitive' emissions

But getting at natural gas buried deep underground requires forceful fluid injections, which one criticsays can leaka medley of chemicals into the surrounding environment.

John Werring,a policy advisor for the David Suzuki Foundation, says thatwithout tough regulations on the hydraulic fracturing process, those methane and other greenhouse gasleaks known as "fugitive" emissionscould cancel out the benefits of using natural gas when compared to other fossil fuels.

"When a well is drilled and fluids are injectedinto the well to release the gas, there's a bigblowbackofa massive amount of natural gas and volatile organic compounds that come out ofthe well before it'scapped," saidWerring.

Werring points to current natural gas projects in northeastern B.C.that he says emit over 100,000 tonnes of fugitive methane annually, the "equivalent of putting over twomillion cars on the road."

Last month, the province's auditor general said meeting reduction targets depends heavily on the size of the natural gas industry that develops in the coming decades.

Regulating risks

Expanding natural gas production means carcinogens such as benzene, tolueneand even radioactive chemicals could end up in the air, water and soil in the surrounding areas, Werringsays.

"There's a lot of people who will end up in the hospital and a lot of children that will be born with birth defects," he said, citing a recent reportfrom the Physicians for Social Responsibility and theConcerned Health Professionals of New Yorkthat warnsof serious health risks associated with fracking.

Pierce said LNG Canada wants to produce natural gas with the lowest emissions in the world, and stressed the consortium's commitment to investing in abatement technologies that could helpB.C.stick to its emissions targets, which aim to reduce greenhouse gases to80 per cent of 2007 levels by 2050.

But Werringthinks the "sheer volume" of fugitive emissions, plus the possibility of earthquakes that could sever underground pipesandcontaminate aquifers used for drinking water,would neutralize any environmental benefits of using natural gas.

"Unless they control emissions at source and put in some kind of strong regulatory mechanism ... and force this industry to clean itself up, they shouldn't be doing anything to expand the problem."

With files from The Early Edition.