B.C. man billed more than $100K to cover cost of fighting 2019 wildfire - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 05:37 AM | Calgary | -13.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

B.C. man billed more than $100K to cover cost of fighting 2019 wildfire

A man living in northwest B.C. has been ordered to pay more than $100,000 to cover the province's cost of fighting a wildfire that started on his property more than four years ago.

Mans lawyer says decision being appealed in B.C. Supreme Court

A man wearing a beige shirt, blue jeans and tan cowboy hat watches as a wildfire burns on a hillside in the distance.
A man watches a forest fire burning on the edge of Kelowna, B.C., in 2009. (Andy Clark/REUTERS)

A man living in northwest British Columbiahas been billed more than $100,000 to cover the province's cost of fighting a wildfire that started on his property in 2019.

Eldon Whalenwas ordered to pay back$100,688 that the government spent extinguishing a wildfire that spreadfrom aburn pile onhis propertyin the Kispiox Valley, roughly 450 kilometres northwest of Prince George, B.C.

"The open fire that caused the wildfire was deliberately ignited, the defences under [the applicable law]do not apply, and, if not for the immediate response of the B.C. Wildfire Service, the impacts of the wildfire would likely have been even more widespread," read a decisionfrom B.C.'s Forest Appeals Commission this spring.

"Whalenhas not convinced me that a reasonable level of care was taken to understand his obligations under the [law] and avoid the contravention."

Whalen is one of the latest people ordered to pay tens of thousands of dollars under a section of provincial law that allows the government to recover firefighting costs from people responsible for starting wildfires including one man who got a bill for half a million dollars.

Fire spread underground, decision says

The decision said Whalenstarted a burn pile to get rid of some vegetative material like grassor tree clippings after clearing some land at his property on Muldoon Road on March 31, 2019.

He lit a Category 2 open fire, or a fireburning a pile of materialno bigger than two metres high and three metres wide. There wasn't a Category 2 fire ban in place at the time and Whalentended the flames with tools and buckets of water over the next days and weeks.

B.C.'s Wildfire Act allows residents to start fires on rural property under conditions that include taking certain precautions to make sure the flames don't spread to the larger forest.

But at some point, Whalen's fire spread.

A yellow helicopter flies through grey smoke to drop water on a wildfire burning on a brown hillside. Evergreen trees are also on the hill.
A helicopter drops water on a wildfire along Skaha Lake in Penticton, B.C., in August 2020. (Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press)

On May 10, Whalen noticed smoke and flames near the site of the pile as he drove past the property and phoned 911.

The fire ultimately threatened homes and burned more than 11 hectares of land, the majority of which was privately owned. No major buildings were lost and no one was hurt, but the decision said the fire "could have been much larger" if firefighters hadn't responded "within the hour."

An investigation confirmed the origin of the fire.Whalen was ordered to pay the $100,688 in 2022,as well as a $3,000 administrative penalty.

Panel rejects defence

He appealed that decision on the grounds that he took reasonable care to ensure the fire didn't spread, like waiting to light the fire until snow had soaked the ground, staying on site after lighting the fire, pouring water on the smouldering fire, visiting the burn pile every day for a week and several times over the following weeks and digging into the ashes to confirm the ground was wet and cold.

Whalen said his mistake was believing the fire was out because there weren't any visible signs it was still burning, like flame or smoke, and not realizing the fire was moving underground.

The panel rejected those defences.

Panel chair Cynthia Lu said it's reasonable to expect that people burning open fires would know about fire creep and holdover fires, orthose that smoulder undetected for a long time.

She also said Whalen could have done more to prevent the wildfire, like asking firefighters' advice before the burn,having a fire-suppression system on hand or taking the pile apart to check for hot spots.

"The conduct listed above does not constitute a 'superhuman'effort," the decision read.

In an email to CBC News,Whalen's lawyer,Lane Perry, said the decision isunder appeal to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

"We disagree with the facts, the application of the relevant law, and the characterization of the parties' submissions as presented in the decision from the Forest Appeals Commission," Perry wrote.

Under the Wildfire Act, the province can recoup firefighting costs from people who cause wildfires. Railway companies and logging corporations can often be on the hook for starting blazes, but individuals have been billed in the past.

One man was ordered to pay more than $500,000 for a fire that started on his land near Kamloopsin 2012, while aCariboo-area man was billed$860,000 in 2011 after hiscampfire spread and turned into a wildfire.