Businessman from China investing in Vancouver real estate ordered to repay millions - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 06:04 PM | Calgary | -5.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Businessman from China investing in Vancouver real estate ordered to repay millions

A Chinese businessman accused of disappearing from China after withdrawing a loan equivalent to $10 million dollars and reappearing in Vancouver in possession of several multi-million dollar properties has been ordered to repay the money in a landmark case.

Landmark decision for financial crime in Canada's real estate market, says lawyer

This $3.5 million home in Surrey B.C., is one of four Lower Mainland homes a Chinese bank claims are owned by a fugitive who defaulted on a $10 million loan. (Homelife Benchmark Realty Corp.)

In what's being described as a landmark case, abusinessman accused of disappearing from China, after withdrawing a loan there equivalent to $10 million and reappearing in Vancouver in possession of several multi-million dollar Lower Mainland properties, has been ordered to repay the money.

In June 2016, lawyers for ChinaCITICBank brought an application before a B.C. Supreme Court judge to freeze the assets of Shibiao Yan, who was accused of approving the withdrawal of a 50 million RMBline of credit extended to a company he controlled in China and never repaying it.

According to court documents, Yan, who has been living in Vancouver with his wife and daughter, purchased three homes in Surrey worth $1 million, $2.3 millionand $3.1 million, while his wife paid $2.5 million for a Vancouver house.

A China CITIC Bank officer said in an affidavit that one of the homes in Vancouver was boughtfollowing awithdrawal onthe line of credit.

The China CITIC Bank took the issue to an arbitration tribunal in China in July 2015, which found Yan personally liable for payment of the debt.

The bank then filed a petition with a B.C. court in August 2016 seeking to recognize and enforce the Chinese arbitration award.

There is some financial crime happening in Vancouver in the real estate market.- China CITICbank lawyer Christine Duhaime

This week, a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled in favour of upholding the Chinese arbitration hearing decision, which ordered Yan to repay the equivalent of nearly $10 million Canadian to the China CITICBank.

More cases to come

Foreign arbitration awards have been enforced in British Columbia before, but this is apparently the first time the avenue has been explored by a state-owned bank in China, involving a Chinese foreign national in Vancouver in the real estate sector.

Christine Duhaime is a Vancouver based lawyer, who specialises in financial crime like counter-terrorist financing and anti-money laundering law. (Alex Waterhouse-Hayward)

"It's the first time that we're aware of where a state owned Chinese government entity has used an arbitration and come to a place like Canada to enforce a loan where the money has come into real estate in Vancouver." said China CITICBank lawyerChristine Duhaime.

According to the court documents, some of the information on Yan and his wife, Ms. Gao, was uncovered by the China CITICBankduring a routine anti-money laundering review.

Duhaime, who is an expert in financial crime, saysChinese banks have been seeing people disappearwith significant amounts of outstandingbank loans.

"I have seen lists of debts from other banks, and yes, there are other cases that other banks in the same situation are looking at to recover," said Duhaime.

She says in the past the banks have simply accepted these losses, but now because of the success of this case many more will look to recover their money.

"It is a good result for B.C. in the sense that I think it sends a positive message that to the extent there is some financial crime happening in Vancouver in the real estate market ... there is some recovery [possible]," said Duhaime.

Duhaime says the bank will now try to recoup the money from Yan, who was given 30 days to appeal the decision.