B.C. premier again presses for more oilsands revenue - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 06:22 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

B.C. premier again presses for more oilsands revenue

B.C. Premier Christy Clark is again signalling that her government could make things difficult for the proposed Northern Gateway oilsands pipeline if its demands for a greater share of the project's economic benefits aren't met.

Says provincial government and First Nations would contest unsanctioned pipeline

Premier Christy Clark says there's no way the Northern Gateway oil pipeline could be built without B.C.'s approval. (CBC)

B.C. Premier Christy Clark is again signalling that her government could make things difficult for the proposed Northern Gateway oilsands pipeline if its demands for a greater share of the project's economic benefits aren't met.

"British Columbia has the power to grant or withhold 60 permits," she told students Tuesday at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy.

"British Columbia's power would be required to power up the pipeline from B.C. Hydro, a Crown corporation. There's a whole number of things the British Columbia government could do and certainly if this project was forced through without meeting the five conditions, it wouldn't be just the British Columbia government that would be in court. It would be every First Nation across the line."

Clark's government has set out five conditionsunder which B.C. would allow projects like Northern Gateway and Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain expansion to go ahead.

Three have to do with the environment, one with aboriginal consultation and one the most contentious with getting a "fair share" of the economic benefits.

This isn't the first time the B.C. government has tried to make this point.

Can't 'force it through'

In July, B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake warned that even if the National Energy Board recommends approval of Enbridge's $6 billion project, there are scores of provincial permits that must be obtained. Clark has also spoken before about how the pipeline would require power from B.C. Hydro.

Later Tuesday, Clark qualified her remarks to reporters.

"To me all the speculation about how British Columbia would stop it is kind of silly because the thing is if British Columbia doesn't give its consent to this, there is no way the federal government or anyone else in the country is going to be able to force it through. It just won't happen."

Clark told the students that it is important for Canada to get its resources to market; the Indian middle class is growing fast and China is rapidly urbanizing.

"Canada needs to be a part of that."

But she said moving thick oilsands bitumen product via the pipeline poses a big environmental riskriskier than lumber, natural gas or other productsand needs to be handled with extreme care.

Citing a study filed to the panel currently reviewing the contentious project, Clark said B.C. stands to bear all of the risk and only eight per cent of the financial rewards.

"If you were in business, would you take that deal?" Clark asked. "And the answer for me is quite simply, I will not."

Clark made a "courtesy call" to her Alberta counterpart Alison Redford on Monday,a meeting which both women described as "frosty" and short on progress. Redford was adamant that Alberta will not share resource royalties with B.C.