'It's a human rights issue': Women fight for the right to be braless on the job

The "burn your bra"movement is back, this time ignited by young women shunning the undergarment not for political reasons, but in the name of comfort.

However, some bralesswomen feel discomfort whenmanagers mandate they must wear one in the workplacea rule that could be deemed discriminatory, because it only applies to one gender.

"It's unnecessary," saidKate Gosek who works as a cook at McDonald's in Selkirk, Man. The 19-year-old saysseveral managers recently harassed her about not wearing a bra, including one who prodded her shoulder in search of one.

"She just told me that I should put on a bra because, McDonald's we are a polite restaurant and no one needs to see that."

Whether or not employers can mandate a woman's undergarments is now the subject of a case before the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal. A hearing date has not been set yet.

It was prompted by a complaint from Christina Schell who claims her previous employer the Osoyoos Golf Club in Osoyoos, B.C. discriminated against her by requiring that female staff wear a bra.

"It's gender-based and that's why it's a human rights issue," she said. "I have nipples and so do the men."

For her protection?

Schell discarded her bras more than two years ago because she finds them uncomfortable.

"They're horrible," said the 25-year-old who took a job as a server at the golf club's restaurant in May.

She says she had no inkling being braless was an issue until a few weeks later when she received the restaurant's new dress code. It stated:"Women must wear either a tank top or bra under their uniform shirt."

Because she served tables at an outdoor patio in hot weather, Schell had no desire to wear an undershirt, either.

"It was absurd," she said. "Why do you get to dictate what's underneath my clothes?"

Schell confronted the golf club's general manager, Doug Robb, and saidhe told her the rule was for her protection.

"He said, 'I know what happens in golf clubs when alcohol's involved.'"

Schell refused to comply, and saidshe was fired as a result. That prompted her to file a human rights complaint.

Robb declined to comment, stating in an email that employee matters are confidential.

Employment lawyer, Nadia Zaman, saidemployers can impose a gender-specific dress code, if they can show there's a genuine occupational requirement, such as for safety reasons.

She questions how requiring an employee to wear a bra can fall into that category.

"If they simply require that female employees wear a bra but then they don't have a similar requirement for males, and they can't really justify thatthen there is a risk that their policy's going to be deemed to be discriminatory," Zaman said.

She refers to the Ontario Human Rights Commission which, following a 2016 CBC News Marketplace investigation, called for an end to sexist dress codes such as high heels and short skirts which only apply to female staff.

"They're basically saying that sexual harassment andgender-based dress codes are off the menu, and they're no longer being tolerated," said Zamanfrom the firm Rudner Law in Toronto.

'An expectation'

Gosek, the McDonald's employee, also feels she has the right to be braless in the workplace, despite instructions from managers to wear one.

She saidone manager advised her to put one on, while looking at her chest.

"She told me they're distracting."

Gosek saidwhen she pointed out to another manager that the McDonald's dress code says nothing about wearing a bra, he replied, "'No, but it is an expectation.'"

Gosek also finds bras uncomfortable and says the pressure to wear one at work made her anxious.

"I'm a really good worker but all of this is making me look like a bad person."

McDonald's Canada clarified that the dress code policy doesn't require Gosek to wear a bra.

Spokesperson, Laura Munzar said in an email that Gosek's troubles were the result of "a misunderstanding in the application of the policy" and that the restaurant would inform her she's not breaking any rules.

Gosek saidshe received an apology this week from two superiors at work.

As for Schell, she's still waiting for the outcome of her human rights complaint to find outif wearing a bra in her case was a justifiable workrequirement.

"It doesn't affect anybody's ability to do their job," she said.