Critics slam fine print in newly released Trans-Pacific Partnership text

Opponents of theTrans-Pacific Partnershipcame out swinging on Thursday after the full text of the trade agreement, negotiated in secrecyover five years, was finally released.

Many have challenged the new Liberal government, specifically Prime Minister Justin Trudeauand International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland on whether theyback the deal as it stands.

The document, about 6,000pages long and released by New Zealand first, also includes23 side letters between Canada and other countries involved in the deal Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.

• Read the full text of the TPP agreement [PDFs]
• Trans-Pacific Partnership text has been released

The first wave of objections to the text in Canada had hit the public sphere by mid-day Thursday.

Intellectual property and protection of Canadians' private information emerged as issues of widespread concern, and drew demands for further study and public input before the deal is ushered through Parliament.

According to a tool created by the Washington Post that made the TPP searchable, the word "privacy" showsup most notablyin the deal's telecommunications, electronic commerce and intellectual property chapters.

Privacy concerns

The language in the e-commerce chapter "fuels uncertainty" over Canadians' privacy, says MichaelGeist, a University of Ottawa law professor who has raised concerns aboutthe TPP.

Provinces such as British Columbia and Nova Scotia have laws to keep government information (such as health data) and personal information within the country to keep people's information safe. The TPP language may limitthe ability of governments to mandate local data storage.

In order to make it easier for businesses to use electronic commerce for trade, it states that the trade deal includes provisions to protect "cross-border transfer of information by electronic means, including personal information, when this activity is for the conduct of the business."

The agreement's ambiguous language makes it possible forTPP members to overridecountries' use of local servers for data storage.

The reason for local data storage often called data localization typically stems from mounting concerns over surveillance activities.

There are fears that if information is no longer allowed to stay on local servers under thelanguage of the trade deal, it will cross the U.S. border and will be accessible to U.S. authorities without suitable privacy protections or oversight.

Since U.S. law provides less privacy protection to foreigners, there is indeed limited legal recourse for Canadian data held in the U.S.

• Keith Boag: Hillary Clinton's opposition to the TPP deal might be just'talking'
• ANALYSIS |Spin Cycle: Only the Conservatives are free traders, right?
• Trans-Pacific Partnership: How the deal was done

"These are rules that create restrictions on a country's ability to establish privacy safeguards,"Geistsaid.

The B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association spoke out about the deal, saying it specifically goes againstprovincial law requiring people's sensitivedata be stored in Canada.

Copyright changes

"Today, it was revealed that the electronic commerce chapterof the TPP does indeed directly contradict the domestic data storage provisions in theFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act," the group said in a release.

• Stephen Harper on TPP: 'We got a good deal'
• Trans-Pacific Partnership: Industry, provincial reaction is mixed

"We cannot abide agreements that put our local lawsat risk," addedB.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association presidentMichaelMarkwick. "This is simply unacceptable."

The language of theTPP deal extends the term of copyright from50 years after an author's death to 70 years without expanding fair use, keepingworks out of the public domain for decades, critics argue.

"Today's release of the full TPP text confirms our worst fears," said JoshTabishofOpenMedia, a grassroots organization fighting for open information on theinternet.

Geist said the TPP text confirmed a "massive loss to Canadian public domain." The 20-year extensionwill result in hundreds of millions in cost, he said.

Eases restrictions on foreign takeovers

If parties from one of the TPP members wants to buy a part of or an entire Canadian company, under the trade deal it will be easier.

It allows foreigners to invest more money into a takeover without underscrutiny from Investment Canada.

Under the pact, investments in Canadian companies of less than $1.5-billion by companies from countries that have signed the TPP will not be subject to Investment Canada examination, the text of the agreement says.
Currently, a takeover bid will be scrutinized at $600-million, and will rise to $800-million by 2017.

There's a number of side letters

In addition to the 6,000 pages of text from the TPP, there are also numerous side letters, or sub-agreements, between nations. Canada has 23 side letters with almost all the TPP countries.

In a deal with the U.S. the two countries have agreed to share information on cases of illicit trade of counterfeit and pirated goods.

With Japan, a deal to protect exports of B.C. logs.

Obama ready to sign

U.S. officials were quick to praise the deal on social media, while launching their own steadfastly pro-American website to house the full text of the TPP.
According to Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada, the strategy of the new government is to direct people to the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade version, what they referred to as the TPP depository.
The deal was touted by some for its positive effects. The U.S. government presented it on its own website and officials there were intent on selling the deal on Thursday, saying the agreement will create jobs and stoke the U.S. economy.
U.S. unions, lawmakers and interest groups questioned the long-awaited text on Thursday, setting up a potentially difficult path to ratification by the U.S. as well.

"It's worse than we thought," Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, told reporters on a conference call after examining the full text.

U.S. labor representatives, who had already voiced opposition to the deal, said the agreement contained weak, poorly worded or unenforceable provisions.

"There are improvements, but we do not believe those improvements are significant or meaningful for workers," Celeste Drake, trade and globalization policy specialist at the AFL-CIO, said on the same call.

President Barack Obama formally notified the U.S. Congress in a letter on Thursday that he intends to sign the deal.

"I know that if you take a look at what's actually in the TPP, you will see that this is, in fact, a new type of trade deal that puts American workers first," Obama wrote on a website dedicated to the full text of the TPP.
President Barack Obama formally notified the U.S. Congress in a letter on Thursday that he intends to sign the deal.

The notice starts a 90-day clock before his signature triggers the next step in a process of seeking final
congressional approval.

Canada's brand new trade minister, Chrystia Freeland, said she will need time to go over all the documents, and encouraged Canadians to do the same.
There will be various hurdles to clear before this is a done deal, but Trudeau has promised ..

Eyes turn to new Liberal government

The deal isshaping up as one of the most controversial items on the new government's agenda.

"It's up to Justin Trudeau to decide whether he'll implement this bad deal, or actually take a stand for Canadians," Tabish said on Thursday.

• Highlights: What's in the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement?
• Canadians divided on benefits of Trans-Pacific Partnership: Vote Compass
• Trans-Pacific Partnership offers dairy sector good news, bad news and a question mark

The Liberals, before assuming power, criticized the Conservative government for a lack of transparency regarding what Canada may have given up in the TPP negotiations, but said they support the notion of free trade.

Trudeau, in a statement on Oct. 5, promised "a full and open public debate in Parliament to ensure Canadians are consulted on this historic trade agreement."

More recently,Trudeauand Japanese Prime MinisterShinzoAbe spoke by telephone and agreed to promote the deal.

"Prime MinisterTrudeaucan't promise open consultations here and then tell others behind closed doors that he'll be able to push the deal through," said NDP MP Don Davies in a press release.

On Thursday, Freeland said she had printed out all 6,000 pages of the deal to familiarize herself with it.

"It is immense thousands and thousands of pages," the new trade minister said, adding that there will be a place where Canadians can send their comments about the deal."We're going to take that seriously and we're going to review it."