Telus speed claims not based on real-world experience - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 03:41 AM | Calgary | -11.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Business

Telus speed claims not based on real-world experience

A recent Telus press release trumpeting how Canadian wireless data speeds are much faster than those in other countries is based on a report that tested advertised speeds not what cellphone users actually experience, CBC News has learned.

Company recently told CRTC not to meddle in Canada's wireless market

A Telus release says Canadians 'enjoy wireless data speeds that are the second fastest in the world,' but it based its claims on advertised speeds, which can be quite different from what most people will see. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

Arguments by Telus against increased competition in the Canadian wireless sector includemisleading statistics that dont reflect reality,critics charge.

The big threetelecoms Bell, Rogersand Telus all told the CRTC at arecent hearing that further regulating the wholesale wireless market to stimulate competition could lead to inferior cellphone service, because itwould discourage themfrom continuing to invest in Canadas high-quality wireless networks.

Europe where countries tend to have more competition and cheaper cellphone rates was held up as a cautionary tale. Wholesale regulation in Europe has led to depressed investment levels, poor quality networksand a digital deficit, warnedTed Woodhead, Telusssenior vice-president of federal government and regulatory affairs.

Canadian supremacy?

To drive the point home, Telus also posted a news release touting Canada's superior mobile internet connection speeds: Canadians enjoy wireless data speeds that are the second fastest in the world, declares the statement, adding that they're three times the average speeds offered in the U.S. and France, and nine times faster than the U.K.

CBC News has learned that Telus got its speed statistics from a2013 OECD report that looked at average advertised mobile download speeds hypothetical speeds companies promote to sell their products that may not live up to the daily reality ofsurfing on a smartphone.

Telus never revealed that its numbers were based on advertised speeds.

They're cherry-picking data and I think that they're really misleading Canadians.Steve Anderson, OpenMedia.ca

They're cherry-picking data and I think that they're really misleading Canadians, saidSteve Anderson, executive director of Vancouver-based OpenMedia.ca

John Lawford with the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) in Ottawa calledthe news release a public relations stunt to scare the general public into this idea that they must not be regulated and [upstart carriers] must not have wholesale access to their networks because they'll stop investing and poor old Canadians at the end of the line will have crappy service.

The OECD report that Telus used warns readers to take its advertised speed stats with a grain of salt, because advertising practices may vary between countries. For instance," it explains, "operators in some countries advertise faster speeds closer to the theoretical maximum which are rarely achieved in real usage.

In April 2012, the United Kingdom issuednew guidelines to combat misleading speed claims. In the OECD report, which compiled its numbers in September 2012, Canada was listed as nine times faster than U.K. advertised speeds.

Real speeds

When CBC looked at actual mobile internet connection speeds across the globe, they told a different story. At an average rate of 7.0 megabits per second, Canada, instead of being nine times faster, was slightly above U.K.s 6.1 Mbps, according toasecond-quarter report by Akamai, a company that monitors web traffic and cloud computing.

In addition,Akamai lists Canada's average speed as just ahead of France and the United States, not three times fasteras Telus claims.

France and the U.K. also beat Canada when comparing average peak speeds. And they offer cheaper cellphone plans according to the2014 Wall Report commissioned by the CRTC.

In a tie with Sweden, Canada placed fifth not second out of 56 countries for average speed, according to the Akamai report. And our country ranked only 23rd, behind 12 European countries,when comparing peak velocity.

"For Telus to come out and say, you know, we have some of fastest networks in the world, theyre ignoring this kind of key metric,"saidAnderson. Looking at that peak speed is a real crucial indicator and one that the big three cellphone providers in Canada aren't keen to look at because they don't come off so well."

Telus responds

When Teluswas asked for comment on this story, spokesman Shawn Hall got back to CBC after this article was published in an email, saying there's a "broad consensus of data out there finding that Canada has some of the best wireless service in the world," and disputing the story for "instead focusing on one data point put forward by an industry critic."

The company saysthere are "numerous other credible reports" that argueCanada's wireless speeds are among the world's best, in particular, singling outa recent report by consulting firm Navigant that found that in 2012, average mobile data connection speeds in North America were about 75 per cent faster than those in Europe, and alsothat Canadian mobile carriers invest far more per connection than their American or European peers do.

The Navigant report was sponsored by Telus and,in a footnote, the authors wrotethey were "grateful to Telus for support" of their research.

Telus, Rogersand Bell were all on the attack at the recent CRTC hearing to examine regulating the wholesale wireless market to help new entrants compete. All three cited the example of Europe, as they argued there shouldnt be further regulation to lower wholesale roaming rates they charge upstart carriers to use their infrastructure. Such a business model, they warned, could quash their motivationto keep upgrading wireless networks.

Imposing regulation creates negative investment incentives which will impact deployment and innovation, particularly in rural and poor communities. It is a dangerous road that should be avoided, testified Telussexpert witness, Christian Dippon with Nera Economic Consulting.

Both PIAC and OpenMedia believe competition would actually encourage more investment in wireless services, not less. What you find is that there's an incentive to invest in infrastructure, so that you can better compete against your rivals, saidAnderson.