Stephen Poloz, unintended champion of jobless youth: Don Pittis - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 07:22 AM | Calgary | -17.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
BusinessAnalysis

Stephen Poloz, unintended champion of jobless youth: Don Pittis

While Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz is taking flak for his advice to jobless youth, Don Pittis says the high-profile attention may help to make youth unemployment a more pressing election issue.

Work-for-free comment puts the spotlight on the plight of young Canadians without employment

Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz may have raised the ire of youth with his comments on unpaid work, but Canada's chief central banker has given the issue of youth unemployment a much higher profile than if he had spoken in platitudes, Don Pittis says. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The furor set off by Bank of Canada governor Stephen Polozthis week may be the best thing to happen for the youth jobs issuein ages.

For the few who didn't notice, the governor of our central bank put his foot in it the other day, telling young people theyshould work for free.

Canada's latest jobsdata from Statistics Canada Friday morningshowed some improvement in the jobless rate for youth, butunemployment among young people is still nearly double that of everyone else.

Poor Stephen. You get the feeling he's not quite as media savvyas, say, his immediate predecessor. Helikelydidn't know what he was getting himself into.

The backlash was terrific, with his off-the-cuff remarkscharacterized by manyas turning a blind eye to current employment standards.

Unemployment among young people has been nearly double that of other Canadians. (Shutterstock)
"Employers in the private sector can't employ interns and pay them zero dollars," said Claire Seaborn from the Canadian Interns Association on CBC's Radio's Metro Morning.

Although there isa patchwork of provincial rules, generally, she says, internships are restricted to those within a specific education program.

Otherwise, employers and unemployed people just aren't allowed to agree that work will be done for free.

Good intentions

"That would essentially be contracting out of the minimum wage," says Seaborn. "Interns can't agree to be paid $3 anhour or zero dollars an hour. It's simply against our employment standard."

Despite the way it played in Peoria, Poloz's intentions were good.

What he is, quite validly, worried about is something that has often been called "generation jobless." And it is phenomenon well-known to have a long-term effect on an entire economy.

Here's how it works.

Imagine you finish your degree in law or commerce during a boom. As you graduate, employers are anxious to snatch up the fresh talent, hiring you young and malleable.

Lucky you, you get on the professional job ladder early and work your way up.

But if instead you complete the exact same qualification during an economic downturn, sometimes even the best graduates go begging.

Poor you, you get part-time work in retail, or worse, can't find a job at all. Even when the boom returns, your educational skills are stale and you are at the back of the line.

Policy problems

If they were my kids, I'd give them the same advice Polozoffered. But then,I am not a high government official. And my saying it does not make it sound like policy.

There are two obvious problems with encouraging free work as policy.One is that that even the smartest poor kids can't afford to work for free.

Youth unemployment is crucial issue, and not just for the youth scouring the job ads for opportunities. (Shutterstock)

The other is that a supply of free workers completely destroys the motivation for employers to actually hire young people and pay them. In a profit-motivated world, lots of free workers makethe youth unemployment problem even worse.

In the past, government youth hiring programs gave kids from all backgrounds a leg up. But the current urge bygovernments to slash the public service means the bottom rung of entry-level jobs is drying up.

Apart from waiting for the economy to kick back into gear, the private sector solution is not obvious.

Government handouts for companies to hire young people arein danger of turning into just one more form of corporate welfare as profit-seeking employers hire the people they would have hired anyway, and simplypay them with taxpayers' money.

I've reported in the past on theshortage of startupcash for young entrepreneurs.

But there are things governments can do. Employers are not currently pulling their weight when it comes to training the next wave of young people. They want their newworkers to arrivefully formed. They each want someone else to do the training.

What about pre-trainees?

One technique might be for governments to make a rule that every employer hire some percentage of their workers as pre-trainees at minimum wage.

It would have no effect on workers whohaveskills or experience that commanded higher wages. And while employers would pay the cost, all would benefit equally.

The Poloz solution will not do as public policy.

But by his comments, our chief central banker has given the issue of youth unemployment a much higher profile than if he had spoken in platitudes. And as we begin a federal election year, he has done it at a perfect time.

As Polozand today's jobless numbers remind us, youth unemployment is crucial issue, and not just for youth.

We should make federal parties realize it is the economicissue of our times.